Re: Non-freeness of the AFL v3.0

Walter Landry writes ("Re: Non-freeness of the AFL v3.0"): > This is the case we have today with svn_load_dirs. Are you saying > that we should not distribute svn_load_dirs until we get this > clarification? I think it would be better to clarify this, but that I don't think the existing situation

Re: Non-freeness of the AFL v3.0

On Tue, 4 Nov 2014 15:42:06 + Ian Jackson wrote: > Francesco Poli writes ("Non-freeness of the AFL v3.0"): > > I am seeking help on bug #689919. > > I disagree with all of your objections to #689919. Could you please write a (short, but reasoned) point-by-point rebuttal of my license analysi

Re: Non-freeness of the AFL v3.0

Francesco Poli writes ("Re: Non-freeness of the AFL v3.0"): > On Tue, 4 Nov 2014 15:42:06 + Ian Jackson wrote: > > I disagree with all of your objections to #689919. > > Could you please write a (short, but reasoned) point-by-point rebuttal > of my license analysis? I'm afraid I don't have ti