Dear debian-legal experts,
we are discussing whether or not the bing logo image [1] should be shipped with
the "jmapviewer" package in main.
I as the package author originally thought that we should not advertise
bing, but Sebastiaan from debian-gis argues that we violated MS terms of
use by not
Dear Ladies and Gentlemen,
could you please tell us under what license we can distribute the Bing
logo [1] (and the "BingAerialTileSource" [2]) in JMapViewer [3] as part of
the Debian linux distribution? (JMapViewer is Open Source (GPL), and we
hope that distributing the bing maps logo along with
> we are discussing whether or not the bing logo image [1] should be shipped
> with
> the "jmapviewer" package in main.
>
> I as the package author originally thought that we should not advertise
> bing, but Sebastiaan from debian-gis argues that we violated MS terms of
> use by not including it
Felix Natter writes ("jmapviewer: bing logo"):
> I as the package author originally thought that we should not advertise
> bing, but Sebastiaan from debian-gis argues that we violated MS terms of
> use by not including it (please see the PDF link included in that mail):
I agree that we should avoi
hi Ian,
Sorry but I've worked ~2 years on the freeplane package for it to be in jessie/main,
und we're ~2 weeks from the jessie freeze, so if including the logo is DFSG compliant
then that is enough for me.
=> So I see two options:
1. I get a positive reply from Microsoft soon --> I w
5 matches
Mail list logo
