libbitcoin license - AGPL with clauses added by SFLC and FSF

2014-05-21 Thread Turkey Breast
Hi, I've made a Bitcoin library, and am seeking inclusion into Debian. We (me and the mentor) are seeking guidance going forwards over a license issue. The basic issue is that this project uses an AGPL license with several additions, which we were given to me by the SFLC and vetted by the FSF.

Re: libbitcoin license - AGPL with clauses added by SFLC and FSF

2014-05-21 Thread Jonas Smedegaard
Quoting Turkey Breast (2014-05-21 14:22:23) > I've made a Bitcoin library, and am seeking inclusion into Debian. We > (me and the mentor) are seeking guidance going forwards over a license > issue. > > The basic issue is that this project uses an AGPL license with several > additions, which we

Re: libbitcoin license - AGPL with clauses added by SFLC and FSF

2014-05-21 Thread Ian Jackson
Jonas Smedegaard writes ("Re: libbitcoin license - AGPL with clauses added by SFLC and FSF"): > Quoting Turkey Breast (2014-05-21 14:22:23) > > I've made a Bitcoin library, and am seeking inclusion into Debian. We > > (me and the mentor) are seeking guidance going forwards over a license > > iss

Re: libbitcoin license - AGPL with clauses added by SFLC and FSF

2014-05-21 Thread Jonas Smedegaard
Quoting Ian Jackson (2014-05-21 17:47:42) > Jonas Smedegaard writes ("Re: libbitcoin license - AGPL with clauses added by > SFLC and FSF"): >> Quoting Turkey Breast (2014-05-21 14:22:23) >>> I've made a Bitcoin library, and am seeking inclusion into Debian. We >>> (me and the mentor) are seeking

Re: libbitcoin license - AGPL with clauses added by SFLC and FSF

2014-05-21 Thread Paul Tagliamonte
On Wed, May 21, 2014 at 06:06:38PM +0200, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: > > I can't figure out exactly what your previous concerns were but it's > > good to hear that they're resolved. > > For the record, my concern was not the AGPL (I am a fan of that too, and > will most likely use it for my packagi

Re: libbitcoin license - AGPL with clauses added by SFLC and FSF

2014-05-21 Thread Jonas Smedegaard
Quoting Paul Tagliamonte (2014-05-21 18:12:11) > On Wed, May 21, 2014 at 06:06:38PM +0200, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: >>> I can't figure out exactly what your previous concerns were but it's >>> good to hear that they're resolved. >> >> For the record, my concern was not the AGPL (I am a fan of that

Re: libbitcoin license - AGPL with clauses added by SFLC and FSF

2014-05-21 Thread Riley Baird
On 21/05/14 22:22, Turkey Breast wrote: > Hi, > > I've made a Bitcoin library, and am seeking inclusion into Debian. We (me and > the mentor) are seeking guidance going forwards over a license issue. > > The basic issue is that this project uses an AGPL license with several > additions, which w