* Hugo Roy [29 18:13]:
> Le mardi 29 novembre 2011 à 17:38 +0100, Bernhard R. Link a écrit :
> > Say I have a blog, that is created by some software. Assume that
> > software contains AGPL code. Am I allowed to run a server that only
> > serves my blog without paying for anything or anyone els
On Tue, Nov 29, 2011 at 04:05:01PM +0100, Hugo Roy wrote:
> I don't understand what is the restriction on running the software. The
> AGPL does not say anything about proxies and firewalls. You can have
> them, or not; it does not care AFAICS.
The reason for there being an AGPL was thus: People st
On Wed, Nov 30, 2011 at 7:00 PM, Mark Weyer wrote:
> The reason for there being an AGPL was thus: People started offering web
> services based on GPL software. RMS would have liked to obtain the source
> code. The GPL did not force the people to disclose their source code,
> because it only restri
On Wed, Nov 30, 2011, "Ben Finney" wrote:
> I think your desired effects for the license are not compatible with
> software freedom, as discussed earlier.
I don't think this is a fair characterization. The effects
that I desire and the philosophy of free software are not
incompatible. I thin
On Wednesday 30 Nov 2011, Clark C. Evans wrote:
> This is reasonable. It'd take quite a bit of time and energy
> to forge a new license, and I realize everyone's volunteer time
> is precious. This list just seemed to be the most appropriate
> forum for discussing a free software license designed
You're receiving this newsletter because you subscribed from our website.
Can't see the message? View it in browser.
ecommerce Headache
ecommerce Headache
happy customer Tips of the day:
5 Holidays Marketing Ideas to Boost Sales
The holiday shopping season runs from November to end of
6 matches
Mail list logo
