Hi,
I wanted to suggest a thesis and dissertation resource that might be useful for
your readers:
http://www.OpenThesis.org
This free database has features such as saved searches, alerts, and portfolios
to organize documents. Of course, you can pay for Proquest or use NDLTD, but
this is the o
>> But copyright doesn't apply to independent invention, which he claims this
>> is, and which seems fairly reasonable. If he independently invented it we
>> only have a trademark claim; if we don't have a trademark claim we have
>> none
Have you actually looked at it? It's not similar. It's iden
> Can it really be "reasonable", in any sense of the word, to
> believe that this company would independently invent an identical
> logo, pixel for pixel, changing only the hue.
No, not reasonable. Unless both copied from the same swirl. Which seems
reasonable. See
http://lists.debian.or
On Wed, Dec 1, 2010 at 9:06 AM, Alessandro Rubini
wrote:
>> Can it really be "reasonable", in any sense of the word, to
>> believe that this company would independently invent an identical
>> logo, pixel for pixel, changing only the hue.
>
> No, not reasonable. Unless both copied from the same swi
The message from 2005 seems to indicate it was produced using Illustrator,
not Photoshop.
Attached is an image I just created using Illustrator 14.0.0, my goal was to
recreate the Debian logo. I used the 'rough charcoal' brush with the swirl
tool. I didn't create the original Debian logo but it
On Wed, Dec 01, 2010 at 10:24:34AM -0600, Michael Cassano wrote:
> The message from 2005 seems to indicate it was produced using Illustrator,
> not Photoshop.
>
> Attached is an image I just created using Illustrator 14.0.0, my goal was to
> recreate the Debian logo. I used the 'rough charcoal' b
Correct, I swirled it too much, that is my point.
What are the odds that the blue logo in question swirled their logo
pixel-for-pixel the same as Debian's? I believe the odds are low given the
couple minutes of work I put into using the tool (Illustrator).
Mike
On Wed, Dec 1, 2010 at 10:30 AM,
Le mercredi 01 décembre 2010 à 17:30 +0100, Mike Hommey a écrit :
> > There is no question in my mind that the blue logo under debate is a copy of
> > the Debian logo, followed by a color change. There are too many degrees of
> > freedom (beginning of the swirl path, brush thickness, etc).
>
> Yo
On Wed, Dec 01, 2010 at 10:40:55AM -0600, Michael Cassano wrote:
> Correct, I swirled it too much, that is my point.
>
> What are the odds that the blue logo in question swirled their logo
> pixel-for-pixel the same as Debian's? I believe the odds are low given the
> couple minutes of work I put
On Tue, 30 Nov 2010 16:47:23 +0100 Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
[...]
> Thanks Joss for the Cc, as I'm not subscribed to -legal (so please keep
> the Cc on replies).
Done.
>
> I've read the thread and I do have some questions for the list. As far
> as I can tell, there is no *trademark* violation
On Sun, Nov 28, 2010 at 10:36:44AM +0100, Alessandro Rubini wrote:
> > FYI - A computer shop has taken the Debian logo and used it for his
> > business.
> > http://imgur.com/gFKfs.jpg
> Thank you for making this jpeg, it's very clear.
> > [...]
> > "The comapny Logo was created by photoshop and
On Wed, Dec 01, 2010 at 02:50:04PM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 28, 2010 at 10:36:44AM +0100, Alessandro Rubini wrote:
> > > FYI - A computer shop has taken the Debian logo and used it for his
> > > business.
>
> > > http://imgur.com/gFKfs.jpg
>
> > Thank you for making this jpeg, i
I didn't get the exact parameters needed to obtain Debian's logo, but I did
show that they are not default.
Mike
On Wed, Dec 1, 2010 at 5:21 PM, Mike Hommey wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 01, 2010 at 02:50:04PM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > On Sun, Nov 28, 2010 at 10:36:44AM +0100, Alessandro Rubini w
13 matches
Mail list logo
