Re: CDDL/GPL and Nexenta (with CDDL libc)

On Thu, 23 Sep 2010 23:42:07 +0200 Josselin Mouette wrote: [...] > The constraints for a CDDL’ed OS are the same as for a proprietary one. This looks correct to me, since I am personally convinced that CDDL'ed works fail to comply with the DFSG and are therefore non-free... My detailed analysis

Stale copyright dates

I'm packaging the PHP PEAR Crypt_Blowfish library. The package has two maintainers, one of which seems to have taken over active maintenance of the library. The copyright information on upstream's source is 2005-2008 by the original (now inactive) author. The newer maintainer has made bugfixes to

US government notification of new crypto package?

I'm packaging the PHP PEAR Crypt_Blowfish module. I noticed: http://www.debian.org/legal/notificationfornewpackages which seems to indicate I need to update the US Bureau of Export Administration before uploading this package for the first time. Is this still a requirement? john -- John Morr

Re: US government notification of new crypto package?

On Sat, Sep 25, 2010 at 10:04 AM, John Morrissey wrote: > I'm packaging the PHP PEAR Crypt_Blowfish module. I noticed: > >  http://www.debian.org/legal/notificationfornewpackages > > which seems to indicate I need to update the US Bureau of Export > Administration before uploading this package fo

Re: Stale copyright dates

On Sat, Sep 25, 2010 at 10:07 AM, John Morrissey wrote: > I'm packaging the PHP PEAR Crypt_Blowfish library. > > The package has two maintainers, one of which seems to have taken over > active maintenance of the library. The copyright information on upstream's > source is 2005-2008 by the origina