Peter Dolding wrote: [...]
> In fact the head of Microsoft has said That only Novell and other
> people who have signed agreements is protected. So all the class
> libraries of mono need to move to the restricted section. Hopefully
> this will push the .Net wanting people to get clarification o
On Mon, Jul 6, 2009 at 6:49 PM, MJ Ray wrote:
> Peter Dolding wrote: [...]
>> In fact the head of Microsoft has said That only Novell and other
>> people who have signed agreements is protected. So all the class
>> libraries of mono need to move to the restricted section. Hopefully
>> this will
On Mon Jul 06 21:04, Peter Dolding wrote:
> What is more worrying here is the progressions of license conversions
> it slowly looks like its completely converting to MIT so meaning
> Novell will not be blocked by shipping if Patent claims come.
GPLv3 would be the only thing which provided any such
Hello,
I hope that an improving economy is bringing new opportunities for growth to
your firm. If you have unexpected needs for additional headcount or need to
quickly fill a role on a temporary/contract basis, please keep BCI in mind.
In the current market, there are many outstanding professi
On Mon, 06 Jul 2009, Peter Dolding wrote:
> non-free is the section I mean. Items in there have restrictions
> that could mean they are non free.
non-free is for things which we can distribute legally but do not meet
the DFSG. Things that are controlled by patents which are actively
enforced for w
Hello list,
Who is the appropriate contact for requesting permission to use the
Iceweasel trademark, in a context other than direct reference to the
rebranded Firefox software? I don't see any text in the latest "iceweasel"
package's copyright file governing usage.
(The intent here is potentia
On 2009-07-07 06:05 +0200, Daniel Richard G. wrote:
> Who is the appropriate contact for requesting permission to use the
> Iceweasel trademark, in a context other than direct reference to the
> rebranded Firefox software? I don't see any text in the latest "iceweasel"
> package's copyright fi
On Tue, Jul 7, 2009 at 12:05 PM, Daniel Richard G. wrote:
> (The intent here is potential commercial use of the mark, e.g. Iceweasel
> plushies.)
I imagine it is too late for this year, but please bring some to DebConf10 :)
--
bye,
pabs
http://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, ema
8 matches
Mail list logo
