EPL + GPL3 ?

2009-03-30 Thread dominik . smatana
Dear legal gurus, I need an advice please. I'm the author of an application built on top of Eclipse Equinox (OSGi) platform: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Equinox_OSGi Equinox is licensed under Eclipse Public License: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eclipse_Public_License I was going to publish m

Re: EPL + GPL3 ?

2009-03-30 Thread Leandro Doctors
2009/3/30  : [...] > I'm the author of an application built on top of Eclipse Equinox (OSGi) > platform: [...] > Equinox is licensed under Eclipse Public License: [...] > I was going to publish my application under GPL3, but I'm afraid that's not > possible due to incompatibility between EPL and GP

partnership issue

2009-03-30 Thread Marketing New-Gen
Hello, This is Marketing New-Gen contacting you again on the possible partnership issue. I emailed you some time ago but never heard back from you. The thing was that I found your website boingboing.net when searching the web on the topics related to my website theme, and would like to partner wi

Re: issues with the AGPL

2009-03-30 Thread Bill Allombert
On Wed, Mar 25, 2009 at 11:04:53PM +, Ian Jackson wrote: > I don't think there are any problems with the AGPL and indeed I might > well consider using the AGPL for works of my own. I don't have time That is not very interesting, because if you are the sole copyright holder, you do not have to

Re: Combining Apache with GPL in one package - Re: libxdoclet-java_1.2.3-2_i386.changes REJECTED

2009-03-30 Thread Joe Smith
Florian Grandel wrote: I have to make a correction from my earlier post. I said: core library licensed under GPLv2 This is not true. See [1] for the core xdoclet license which doesn't seem to be any standard license. The licence you linked to is the standard 3-clause BSD. They even forgot