Hi,
I am preparing a package called get-iplayer, and a potential sponsor has
asked me to get your opinion before we go further.
If you don't already know, the iPlayer is the BBC's online catch-up
service for television and radio programmes broadcast in the previous 7
days. Programmes are availabl
In message <20090304093237.ga17...@lupin.powdarrmonkey.net>, Jonathan
Wiltshire writes
get_iplayer (renamed to get-iplayer for Debian naming restrictions)
avoids this by fetching programmes through the iPhone channel in
reasonable quality and saving them to disk. However, this also evades
the DR
René Mayorga wrote:
> Is this OK?, I can just let this file to stay at upstream tarball?
> or I should remove it.
If it's not used, I'd remove it. I'm confused about its status.
If it's used and no-one explains why APSL is LGPL-compatible, I'd ask
BOINC whether there was some permission to rere
Jonathan Wiltshire wrote:
> I am preparing a package called get-iplayer, and a potential sponsor has
> asked me to get your opinion before we go further.
I have used get-iplayer on occasion. Thank you to all involved in the
third-party debian packages.
[...]
> get_iplayer (renamed to get-iplaye
On Wed Mar 04 09:32, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote:
> get_iplayer (renamed to get-iplayer for Debian naming restrictions)
> avoids this by fetching programmes through the iPhone channel in
> reasonable quality and saving them to disk. However, this also evades
> the DRM protection so the user is free t
"Anthony W. Youngman" wrote:
> Not the Debian position, but more the general Free Software attitude of
> "respect other peoples' copyrights" ...
>
> get-iplayer should implement a technical system whereby it downloads the
> expiry dates, and auto-deletes the files if the expiry date has passed.
Hi
Cameron Dunlap here. If
you missed my Webinar last Wed.
on buying and selling Bulk REO's
with no mon'ey or cre'dit you're in
luck. Sal Buscemi hasd agreed to
do an encore training with me on
Thursday, 3/5/09 at 8:00 PM East,
5:00 PM West.
It was the best training I've presented
in a long tim
In message <49ae6b15.fqybgcvyp1ig7h3c%...@phonecoop.coop>, MJ Ray
writes
"Anthony W. Youngman" wrote:
Not the Debian position, but more the general Free Software attitude of
"respect other peoples' copyrights" ...
get-iplayer should implement a technical system whereby it downloads the
expiry
"Anthony W. Youngman" wrote:
> In message <49ae6b15.fqybgcvyp1ig7h3c%...@phonecoop.coop>, MJ Ray
> writes [...]
> >Do the copyright terms of things on iplayer actually have expiry
> >dates, or is that something merely enforced by technical measures on
> >some of the download methods?
>
> If I've
On Wed, 04 Mar 2009 10:21:40 + MJ Ray wrote:
[...]
> Section 7 of http://www.opensource.apple.com/apsl/1.1.txt
> allows us to pick a later version, so we can use it under the free
> software APSL 2.0.
I don't think the APSL 2.0 is acceptable for main.
Last time we discussed this license on d
Francesco Poli wrote:
> I don't think the APSL 2.0 is acceptable for main.
[...]
> Please see the following thread
> http://lists.debian.org/debian-legal/2004/06/msg00545.html
> for all the details.
So, to summarise:
- it contaminates other software (DFSG 9) in patent-afflicted places,
and/or dis
11 matches
Mail list logo
