Francesco Poli wrote:
> On Sun, 18 Jan 2009 20:27:16 +0100 Mark Weyer wrote:
>
>> Thanks for your reply.
>
> You're welcome! :)
>
>> On Sun, Jan 18, 2009 at 05:43:05PM +0100, Francesco Poli wrote:
> [...]
> In other words, you want to maximize compatibility with other copyleft
> licenses and still
On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 09:26:20AM +, Дмитрий Ледков wrote:
> Francesco Poli wrote:
> > In other words, you want to maximize compatibility with other copyleft
> > licenses and still have a copyleft license...
> > I think these two requirements are _very_ hard to satisfy at the same
> > time; it
Дмитрий Ледков writes:
> Francesco Poli wrote:
> > [...]
> > Same disclaimers as before: IANAL, TINLA, IANADD, TINASOTODP.
>
> Erhhhmm. What do these stand for? I can only guess IANADD from
> mentors list - does it stand for I am not a Debian Developer? What
> about the others?
For reasons
* Sean Kellogg [090119 01:58]:
> Having said all that, the meaning of this paragraph -- to me, at least
> -- is straight forward. It says that the U.S. Government, having
> decided to deny itself a copyright in the U.S., does not preclude
> itself from accepting a copyright from a different jurisd
On Mon, 19 Jan 2009 21:03:32 +1100 Ben Finney wrote:
> Дмитрий Ледков writes:
>
> > Francesco Poli wrote:
> > > [...]
> > > Same disclaimers as before: IANAL, TINLA, IANADD, TINASOTODP.
> >
> > Erhhhmm. What do these stand for? I can only guess IANADD from
> > mentors list - does it stand fo
On Monday 19 January 2009 02:03:32 am Ben Finney wrote:
> Дмитрий Ледков writes:
>
> > Francesco Poli wrote:
> > > [...]
> > > Same disclaimers as before: IANAL, TINLA, IANADD, TINASOTODP.
> >
> > Erhhhmm. What do these stand for? I can only guess IANADD from
> > mentors list - does it stand
In message <200901191101.08985.skell...@gmail.com>, Sean Kellogg
writes
Stated a tad more fairly to those who have asked Fancesco to add
disclaimers... Francesco has a tendency to state opinions a little too
"matter-of-factly" for some d-l participents, leading those who
disagree to accuse him
In message <20090119110756.ga18...@pcpool00.mathematik.uni-freiburg.de>,
Bernhard R. Link writes
* Sean Kellogg [090119 01:58]:
Having said all that, the meaning of this paragraph -- to me, at least
-- is straight forward. It says that the U.S. Government, having
decided to deny itself a copyr
On Monday 19 January 2009 11:59:13 am Anthony W. Youngman wrote:
> In message <200901191101.08985.skell...@gmail.com>, Sean Kellogg
> writes
> >Stated a tad more fairly to those who have asked Fancesco to add
> >disclaimers... Francesco has a tendency to state opinions a little too
> >"matter-o
Dear debian-legal
I have a few questions about licensing debian/*
The proposed copyright format and policy suggest that the packaging data
should be licensed. And that has raised a few questions for the trivial
package I'm working on.
1) What is the recommended license? Public domain? Considerin
Дмитрий Ледков writes:
> I have a few questions about licensing debian/*
>
> The proposed copyright format and policy suggest that the packaging
> data should be licensed.
Like any other intellectual work expressed in some form, with very few
exceptions.
> And that has raised a few questions f
Sean Kellogg wrote:
>On Monday 19 January 2009 02:03:32 am Ben Finney wrote:
>>
>> He apparently finds it best to include these disclaimers to forestall
>> such ire. Which is a perfectly valid position for him to take, given
>> the persistence of said ire, and its peculiar tendency to be directed
12 matches
Mail list logo
