Re: enabling transport and on storage encryption in bacula on debian build

2009-01-05 Thread Thomas Stegbauer
Hello everybody, thanx for all your answer's. I think Version 3 wont make it into Debian 5.0 Lenny :( so the only solution for me would be to compile the version by my own on each needed machine, what is imho unhappy, but if this is the only solution :( hopefully the licence's of version 3 are co

Re: enabling transport and on storage encryption in bacula on debian build

2009-01-05 Thread Bernhard R. Link
* Kern Sibbald [090104 19:21]: > The current released version (2.4.x) series under an interpretation that > OpenSSL is not a system library routine, which is Debian's position, means > that they cannot distribute Bacula with OpenSSL enabled (Bacula > communications and data encryption). substitut

Re: enabling transport and on storage encryption in bacula on debian build

2009-01-05 Thread Ken Arromdee
> > 1. Build it from source yourself (perfectly legal -- only distribution > > violates the GPL license). Isn't it the FSF's position that "user does the link" violates GPL? Of course, even then, that only applies to distribution--which means that the user can build it from source himself, but t

How To Broker REOs In A Down Market.

2009-01-05 Thread Buscemi, Salvatore M.
Dear Friend, This past Friday our firm was quoted again in the press. This time it was in the Investor’s Business Daily, and the article details how to manage out of state borrower’s of defaulted paper. Please be sure to read it before it is taken offline. http://www.investors.com/editorial/

Re: enabling transport and on storage encryption in bacula on debian build

2009-01-05 Thread Kern Sibbald
On Monday 05 January 2009 23:08:33 Ken Arromdee wrote: > > > 1. Build it from source yourself (perfectly legal -- only distribution > > > violates the GPL license). > > Isn't it the FSF's position that "user does the link" violates GPL? No. Please read the GPL. > > Of course, even then, that only