Re: GPL photographies, eg for backround

2008-12-31 Thread Josselin Mouette
Le lundi 29 décembre 2008 à 10:44 -0800, Ken Arromdee a écrit : > On Mon, 29 Dec 2008, Josselin Mouette wrote: > > More precisely: if you are the copyright owner, you can publish it in > > whatever format you like, and if under a free license (e.g. the GPL), it > > will be acceptable for Debian. >

Re: GPL photographies, eg for backround

2008-12-31 Thread Francesco Poli
On Wed, 31 Dec 2008 15:33:48 +0100 Josselin Mouette wrote: > Le lundi 29 décembre 2008 à 10:44 -0800, Ken Arromdee a écrit : [...] > > If you GPL a program and don't provide source code > > Indeed, but we are not talking of a program but of pictures here. I am convinced that this distinction is

Re: GPL photographies, eg for backround

2008-12-31 Thread Josselin Mouette
Le mercredi 31 décembre 2008 à 15:50 +0100, Francesco Poli a écrit : > > Indeed, but we are not talking of a program but of pictures here. > > I am convinced that this distinction is (almost) irrelevant from the > GPL point of view. The relevance comes from the fact that pictures can be their own

Re: GPL photographies, eg for backround

2008-12-31 Thread Francesco Poli
On Wed, 31 Dec 2008 17:09:53 +0100 Josselin Mouette wrote: > Le mercredi 31 décembre 2008 à 15:50 +0100, Francesco Poli a écrit : > > > Indeed, but we are not talking of a program but of pictures here. > > > > I am convinced that this distinction is (almost) irrelevant from the > > GPL point of v

Re: GPL photographies, eg for backround

2008-12-31 Thread Ken Arromdee
On Wed, 31 Dec 2008, Josselin Mouette wrote: > > > More precisely: if you are the copyright owner, you can publish it in > > > whatever format you like, and if under a free license (e.g. the GPL), it > > > will be acceptable for Debian. > > Say what? > > If you GPL a program and don't provide sourc