* Ben Finney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-01-30 16:01:07 +1100]:
> Barry deFreese <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > On of the big things I need to know about are the copyright files.
> > Upstream doesn't specify any years for Copyright that I can find.
>
> Copyright notices are only valid if they c
Am Mo 28 Jan 2008 09:25:21 CET
schrieb Sean Kellogg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> I cannot speak to the British system, so John
> my very well be right in that context, but in the United States the
> critical question is whether the advice being given is of a specific
> or general nature.
In Germany the
Am Mo 28 Jan 2008 09:27:54 CET
schrieb "John Halton" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Perhaps first of all we need to ask if there is a legal system on
> earth that would regard contributing to this mailing list as
> constituting "legal advice" in the first place.
Okay: Yes there is. At least the German on
Hi *,
I'm packaging a new software for the Debian-Med group, and the source shows
this statement:
/* This code may be used and modified for non-commercial purposes*/
/* but redistribution in any form requires written permission. */
This is clearly non-DFSG-free.
I've
Tristan Seligmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> * Ben Finney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> > Copyright notices are only valid if they contain all three of:
> >
> > * The word "Copyright" and/or the copyright symbol "©"
> > * The year(s) the copyright began in the work
> > * The name of the lega
Ben Finney wrote:
> My understanding is that a copyright declaration on the work makes it
> easier to prove to a court that the recipient knows that the work *is*
> copyrighted to the specified entity, and that the copyright is
> current.
"Furthermore, in the event that a work is infringed, if the
* Arnoud Engelfriet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-01-30 15:57:06 +0100]:
> Ben Finney wrote:
> > My understanding is that a copyright declaration on the work makes it
> > easier to prove to a court that the recipient knows that the work *is*
> > copyrighted to the specified entity, and that the copyri
Tristan Seligmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hmm. This is frustrating, because on the one hand, it's probably
> worth avoiding an "innocent infringement defense"; on the other
> hand, updating copyright notices every year seems like a rather
> tedious task that people typically don't ever get a
On Wednesday 30 January 2008 04:33:19 pm Tristan Seligmann wrote:
> Hmm. This is frustrating, because on the one hand, it's probably worth
> avoiding an "innocent infringement defense"; on the other hand, updating
> copyright notices every year seems like a rather tedious task that
> people typical
Dear debian-legal,
A non-free program for which I maintain a package has changed its UI
toolkit from lesstif to Qt. The program is free for non-commercial use,
and upstream payed for a Qt licence. I understand that producing
binaries within Debian would be an infringement of the Qt licence.
Upstre
Vous n'avez pas encore votre site Internet ?
Nous vous proposons la création de votre site clé en main (*)
Une conception adaptée avec des informations claires et précises.
Une charte graphique optimisée et conçue pour vos activités.
Voir nos créations
Vous possédez déjà votre s
12 matches
Mail list logo
