Hello there, I am not subscriber of this list, please
reply to me in CC, thanks in advance!
ftpmaster reject my new package Phamm www.phamm.org
due Image license restriction:
[...Hi Maintainer,
rejected, this wont go into main, the image license forbids that.
You also, even if you want to go to
On 10/12/2007, Alessandro De Zorzi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> PHAMM USE LOGO LICENSE
>
> This logo or a modified version may be used by anyone to refer to the Phamm
> project, but does not indicate endorsement by the project.
>
> Note: we would appreciate that you make the image a link to
> http:
On Mon, 10 Dec 2007 18:16:48 + John Halton wrote:
> On 10/12/2007, Alessandro De Zorzi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > PHAMM USE LOGO LICENSE
> >
> > This logo or a modified version may be used by anyone to refer to
> > the Phamm project, but does not indicate endorsement by the project.
> >
>
On Mon, Dec 10, 2007, Francesco Poli wrote:
> I am Cc:ing the DPL, because I would love to hear whether there is any
> progress on the Debian Logo licensing issue.
> I am not aware of any recent development on this front: what's the
> current plan?
> Sam, this debian-legal thread starts here:
> ht
On Mon, Dec 10, 2007 at 10:12:53PM +0100, Francesco Poli wrote:
> Wait, wait! Debian's own policy is not satisfactory! At least, I
> don't consider it to be satisfactory (or DFSG-free), and other
> people seem to agree with me that it should be changed.
I'm aware that the licensing position regard
On Mon, 10 Dec 2007 22:25:41 +0100 Sam Hocevar wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 10, 2007, Francesco Poli wrote:
>
> > I am Cc:ing the DPL, because I would love to hear whether there is
> > any progress on the Debian Logo licensing issue.
> > I am not aware of any recent development on this front: what's the
On Mon, 10 Dec 2007 22:28:55 + John Halton wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 10, 2007 at 10:12:53PM +0100, Francesco Poli wrote:
> > Wait, wait! Debian's own policy is not satisfactory! At least, I
> > don't consider it to be satisfactory (or DFSG-free), and other
> > people seem to agree with me that it s
On Mon, Dec 10, 2007 at 10:28:55PM +, John Halton wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 10, 2007 at 10:12:53PM +0100, Francesco Poli wrote:
> > Wait, wait! Debian's own policy is not satisfactory! At least, I
> > don't consider it to be satisfactory (or DFSG-free), and other
> > people seem to agree with me tha
On Mon, Dec 10, 2007 at 03:34:45PM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
> The whole reason the licensing of the Debian logos is being changed
> is because the previous licensing made them unsuitable for use
> within the main archive. This is generally acknowledged as a bug,
> but shipping the official Debi
Special Package for this week
Licensed Doctors in the USA
788,051 in total * 17,856 emails
Doctors in many different specialties
16 different sortable fields
American Pharmaceutical Company Listing
47,000 personal emails and names of decision makers
American Hospital Database
Complete co
10 matches
Mail list logo
