Re: Distributability of Ruby's PDF::Writer

2007-12-01 Thread John Halton
On Sat, Dec 01, 2007 at 01:00:08AM +0100, Francesco Poli wrote: > Wait: the content and output of these programs is here licensed > under the terms of CC-by-nc-sa-v2.0 (which is utterly non-free). > What does this mean? Does "the content" mean the programs > themselves? Or something else (in that c

Re: [Pkg-fonts-devel] final stixfonts licence

2007-12-01 Thread Francesco Poli
On Sun, 18 Nov 2007 07:57:52 +0930 Paul Wise wrote: > On Nov 18, 2007 3:18 AM, Francesco Poli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > but the license text does not seem to be much changed. > > There are licence differences to the one I posted before, but that was > just because they made a mistake in w

Re: Distributability of Ruby's PDF::Writer

2007-12-01 Thread Florian Weimer
* John Halton: > On Fri, Nov 30, 2007 at 09:11:19PM +0100, Florian Weimer wrote: >> * Gunnar Wolf: >> >> > 2- This is the main reason I contact -legal: The short license >> >regarding the Adobe PostScript AFM files does mention 'for any >> >purpose and without charge'. How would you inter