Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 06, 2007 at 08:38:39PM +0100, Joerg Schilling wrote:
> > >I talked to someone on IRC and looks like the only license issue concerns
> > >mkisofs. This links to both GPL and CDDL code and this is illegal.
>
> > This is of course a lie:
>
>
On 07/11/2007, Joerg Schilling <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > GPL forbids GPL code to
> > > appear inside non-GPL project, but it allows non-GPL code to appear in GPL
> > > projects.
As has been said already, the GPL does allow non-GPL code to appear in
GPL projects, but it requires that code th
On Wednesday 07 November 2007 05:44:02 am John Halton wrote:
> Incidentally, are there any other actual lawyers who participate on
> this mailing list? Anyone want to show themselves...?
Sure, I'll pipe up. I'm licensed in the State of California, but
don't practice, having decided to stick with
On 07/11/2007, Shriramana Sharma <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> First time I've seen TINLA used with IAAL instead of IANAL.
Well, really it's the IAALs who need to worry about making that clear
more than the IANALs.
> :) Hello John, nice to meet you.
Thanks for the welcome. :-)
Incidentally, are
John Halton wrote:
(IAAL but TINLA)
First time I've seen TINLA used with IAAL instead of IANAL.
:) Hello John, nice to meet you.
Shriramana Sharma.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Joerg Schilling writes ("Re: The legality of cdrecord"):
> This is of course a lie:
You should disregard everything Joerg Schilling writes about licences.
He is a well-known kook on the subject, and we (Debian) have had
considerable trouble with him before.
Ian.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [E
Richard Guenther writes ("Applications linking against GPLv2 only libqt3/libqt4
and [L]GPLv3+ libraries"):
> With the last version updates both libgsl0ldbl and libgmp3c2 became
> GPLv3+ respective LGPLv3+. But there exist numerous applications
> linking against one of these libraries, simultaneo
On Wed, Nov 07, 2007 at 03:57:18PM +0100, Alexander Terekhov wrote:
> On 11/7/07, John Halton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> [...]
> > I'd be interested to know which "lawyer statements" you are referring
> > to (genuine question - feel free to mail me the details off-list if
> > you've previously po
Sean Kellogg wrote:
and apply the more vague clauses of the DFSG.
What vague clauses of the DFSG?
Shriramana.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Wednesday 07 November 2007 03:30:37 pm Shriramana Sharma wrote:
> Sean Kellogg wrote:
> > and apply the more vague clauses of the DFSG.
>
> What vague clauses of the DFSG?
Oh... no you don't :)
I'm not getting drawn into the fight without at least some sort of
grounded facts. Debates abou
10 matches
Mail list logo
