Re: Why is firebird in Debian?

2007-07-21 Thread Joe Smith
"Anthony Towns" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 1) The MPL requires you to make the source code to your modifications available for six-to-twelve months electronically _or_ to make it available on the same media as the executable version. We do the latter. In thi

Re: Why is firebird in Debian?

2007-07-21 Thread Anthony Towns
On Fri, Jul 20, 2007 at 10:19:03PM -0700, Mike Bird wrote: > Anthony Towns, [...] > It appears that You are distributing firebird2-common in violation > of IPL section 3.6, and therefore in violation of copyright law in > many jurisdictions. Okay, so the extent of your complaint is that you don'

Re: Why is firebird in Debian?

2007-07-21 Thread Francesco Poli
On Sat, 21 Jul 2007 13:12:15 +1000 Anthony Towns wrote: [...] > On Fri, Jul 20, 2007 at 08:16:45PM +0200, Francesco Poli wrote: > > According To Anthony Towns, I Am Always Wrong Because IANADD/IANAL [...] > Uh, guys, stop being insane. Politeness is always appreciated, thanks. [...] > 2) That yo

Re: Why is firebird in Debian?

2007-07-21 Thread Mike Bird
On Saturday 21 July 2007 02:35, Anthony Towns wrote: > On Fri, Jul 20, 2007 at 10:19:03PM -0700, Mike Bird wrote: > > It appears that You are distributing firebird2-common in violation > > of IPL section 3.6, and therefore in violation of copyright law in > > many jurisdictions. > > Okay, so the ex

Re: [sdcc-devel] Licensing and building from real source

2007-07-21 Thread Borut Razem
Bas Wijnen wrote: Furthermore, we want to build the package from real source, which means regenerating configure and Makefile.in (where applicable). For this, we use the following commands: export AUTOMAKE=automake-1.10 export ACLOCAL=aclocal-1.10 autoreconf --force --install --symlink This gi

Re: Why is firebird in Debian?

2007-07-21 Thread MJ Ray
Francesco Poli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Fri, 20 Jul 2007 00:59:16 +0100 (BST) MJ Ray wrote: > > Francesco Poli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > Could someone explain to me why firebird is in main? > > > > Because some ftpmaster hit approve, no-one found a bad enough > > bug to change it and this pl

Re: Why is firebird in Debian?

2007-07-21 Thread MJ Ray
Can everybody please calm down and avoid shooting each other? ;-) There's been hamster-beating questions, mental health mudslinging and more... Anthony Towns <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > 1) The MPL requires you to make the source code to your modifications > available for six-to-twelve months ele

Re: Why is firebird in Debian?

2007-07-21 Thread Sean Kellogg
On Saturday 21 July 2007 07:30:32 am Mike Bird wrote: > On Saturday 21 July 2007 02:35, Anthony Towns wrote: > > On Fri, Jul 20, 2007 at 10:19:03PM -0700, Mike Bird wrote: > > > It appears that You are distributing firebird2-common in violation > > > of IPL section 3.6, and therefore in violation o

Doppler Color: Para un embarazo sin problemazs

2007-07-21 Thread Cuidando al feto goMGDDEZpgYprJt
¿Quiere conocer a su bebe antes del parto? A través de la ecografía 4D - usted mamá y papá tienen la inolvidable oportunidad de poder conocer a su pequeño hijo antes que nazca, puede ver todos sus movimientos en tiempo real y es más, incluye una grabación en DVD también en vhs Para lo cual c

Re: Why is firebird in Debian?

2007-07-21 Thread Francesco Poli
On Sat, 21 Jul 2007 18:18:53 +0100 (BST) MJ Ray wrote: > Francesco Poli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Fri, 20 Jul 2007 00:59:16 +0100 (BST) MJ Ray wrote: > > > Francesco Poli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > Could someone explain to me why firebird is in main? > > > > > > Because some ftpmaster hit