Re: Bacula and OpenSSL

2007-07-13 Thread Josselin Mouette
Le vendredi 13 juillet 2007 à 07:20 +0200, Kern Sibbald a écrit : > > Then, unless I have seriously misunderstood the reworded system > > libraries exception, I think relicensing Bacula under the GPLv3 (or > > dual-licensing under v2 and v3) should be fine for Debian. > > Sorry, but could you run

Re: Bacula and OpenSSL

2007-07-13 Thread Thomas Dickey
Kern Sibbald <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I would like a tit-for-a-tat clause so that those who modify it and > distribute > it are obligated to publish their modifications. The MIT license does not > provide that. On the other hand, the MIT license permits even use by the objectionable perso

Re: LGPL v3 compatibilty

2007-07-13 Thread Michelle Konzack
# ATTENTION: I am currently NOT in Strasbourg because# # haveing the last 4 weeks of my military # # service and can not reply in short delays. # ###

Debian Logo license infringement

2007-07-13 Thread Ricardo Yanez
Hi debian legal list, I've been approached by what seems to be an attorney from a Chilean NGO called "Derechos Digitales" (http://www.derechosdigitales.org/), pointing out that a financial newspaper called "Diario Financiero" (http://www.elfinanciero.cl/) is using the Debian swirl logo illegally.

Re: Debian Logo license infringement

2007-07-13 Thread Ben Finney
"Ricardo Yanez" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I've been approached by what seems to be an attorney from a Chilean > NGO called "Derechos Digitales" (http://www.derechosdigitales.org/), > pointing out that a financial newspaper called "Diario Financiero" > (http://www.elfinanciero.cl/) is using the