Ben Finney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> The GPL also requires that any derivative work that one distributes
> must be licensed under the GPL terms. This is incompatible with
> taking part of a work under a different license and combining it
> with the GPL work to distribute.
This is true only, o
On Sun, 27 May 2007, Francesco Poli wrote:
> On Wed, 23 May 2007 22:05:54 +0100 Anthony W. Youngman wrote:
> [...]
> > If you use the word "proprietary", you are merely echoing the
> > terminology used/popularised by Microsoft - do you remember their
> > marketing slogan "Unix is proprietary, Wi
On Sun, 27 May 2007 10:21:26 +1000 Ben Finney wrote:
> Matthew Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > what if the recording was of actual people playing actual
> > instruments? You know, like people always used to. How to you
> > generate that from 'source' at build time? what _is_ the source
On Sun, 27 May 2007 14:59:49 +1000 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On 5/27/07, Francesco Poli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Tue, 22 May 2007 15:31:21 -0400 Jason Spiro wrote:
> >
> > [...]
> > > So, I took
> > > http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd-nc/1.0/legalcode
> > > and made some changes.
On Sun, 27 May 2007 02:43:41 -0700 Don Armstrong wrote:
> On Sun, 27 May 2007, Francesco Poli wrote:
[...]
> > Whatever the its origin is[1], the term "proprietary" is now a
> > well-established[2] word used as opposed to "free" (as in freedom).
>
> And no, it's not a well-established word in tha
On Sun, 27 May 2007, Francesco Poli wrote:
> On Sun, 27 May 2007 02:43:41 -0700 Don Armstrong wrote:
> > On Sun, 27 May 2007, Francesco Poli wrote:
> [...]
> > > Whatever the its origin is[1], the term "proprietary" is now a
> > > well-established[2] word used as opposed to "free" (as in freedom).
6 matches
Mail list logo
