[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>I remember reading that the GFDL is not DFSG-free (due to some clauses
>regarding invariant sections or something) so I would like to know what
As long as you do not use these optional clauses it is free like any
other DFSG license.
OTOH, you should ask yourself what is
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>The troublesome clause in the copyright licence is probably
>"3) You may not charge a fee for the game itself. This includes reselling the
> game as an individual item."
>
>Does this get into debian because the above is a trivially-avoidable
>restriction with a Hello Worl
Am 2007-05-22 13:30:24, schrieb Sam Hocevar:
> 3. Nexenta: Despite their incompatibility, Debian accepts both the
> CDDL and GPLv2 as valid free software licences and would welcome any
^^
Can this start a flame now? (I mean cdrtools => Jürg Sch
On Thu, May 24, 2007 at 07:27:36PM +0200, Michelle Konzack wrote:
> Am 2007-05-22 13:30:24, schrieb Sam Hocevar:
> > 3. Nexenta: Despite their incompatibility, Debian accepts both the
> > CDDL and GPLv2 as valid free software licences and would welcome any
> ^
On Thu, May 24, 2007 at 07:27:36PM +0200, Michelle Konzack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Am 2007-05-22 13:30:24, schrieb Sam Hocevar:
> > 3. Nexenta: Despite their incompatibility, Debian accepts both the
> > CDDL and GPLv2 as valid free software licences and would welcome any
>
On Tue, 22 May 2007, Sam Hocevar wrote:
> 3. Nexenta: Despite their incompatibility, Debian accepts both the
> CDDL and GPLv2 as valid free software licences and would welcome any
> solution to the distribution of a Debian system based on OpenSolaris.
This is not the case, unfortunatly, and
Am 2007-05-24 19:44:38, schrieb Mike Hommey:
> On Thu, May 24, 2007 at 07:27:36PM +0200, Michelle Konzack <[EMAIL
> PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Am 2007-05-22 13:30:24, schrieb Sam Hocevar:
> > > 3. Nexenta: Despite their incompatibility, Debian accepts both the
> > > CDDL and GPLv2 as valid free s
Anthony W. Youngman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> [...] I haven't learnt how to make my keyboard produce a=20
> copyright symbol?
Type: Compose o c
On GB keyboards, I think that's usually Shift+AltGr o c unless
some option like compose:menu was given to X.
It's also on Shift+AltGr+c here, but tha
On May 24, Don Armstrong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This is not the case, unfortunatly, and it really would be wise in the
> future to consult with people who are familiar with the arguments
> surrounding such licenses before expressing Debian's opinion to the
> FSF.
Do you mean the ftpmasters,
On Thu, 24 May 2007, Marco d'Itri wrote:
> On May 24, Don Armstrong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > This is not the case, unfortunatly, and it really would be wise in the
> > future to consult with people who are familiar with the arguments
> > surrounding such licenses before expressing Debian's
Le jeudi 24 mai 2007 à 10:54 -0700, Don Armstrong a écrit :
>This License shall be governed by the law of the jurisdiction
>specified in a notice contained within the Original Software
>(except to the extent applicable law, if any, provides otherwise),
>excluding such jurisdiction's
Josselin Mouette writes:
> Le jeudi 24 mai 2007 à 10:54 -0700, Don Armstrong a écrit :
>>This License shall be governed by the law of the jurisdiction
>>specified in a notice contained within the Original Software
>>(except to the extent applicable law, if any, provides otherwise),
>>
Le jeudi 24 mai 2007 à 15:36 -0400, Michael Poole a écrit :
> > Please stop the choice-of-law bullshit. This clause is moot, we can
> > ignore it.
>
> Moot in what venues? I live in a state that has enacted the Uniform
> Computer Information Transactions Act (UCITA), which -- among other
> things
On Thu, 24 May 2007, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> Please stop the choice-of-law bullshit. This clause is moot, we can
> ignore it.
The problem is not the choice-of-law, but the choice-of-venue clause,
as you yourself indicated in.[1] I don't know why it has yet to be
removed by Sun, but we were told
Josselin Mouette writes:
> Le jeudi 24 mai 2007 à 15:36 -0400, Michael Poole a écrit :
>> > Please stop the choice-of-law bullshit. This clause is moot, we can
>> > ignore it.
>>
>> Moot in what venues? I live in a state that has enacted the Uniform
>> Computer Information Transactions Act (UCIT
On May 24, Don Armstrong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The DFSG is a set of guidelines; there are many things that licenses
> can do which would be anathema to Free Software but are not
> specifically excluded by the DFSG.
But still, the first two sentences of the SC read:
"We provide the guide
16 matches
Mail list logo
