Re: Swiftfox license

2007-04-06 Thread Don Armstrong
On Fri, 06 Apr 2007, Mike Hommey wrote: > This tells that *swiftfox*binaries* are not distributable, not the > binaries we would obtain building from sources. Until you get to section 3: 3. Source code only is licensed MPL as required by mozilla.org http://www.mozilla.org/MPL/MPL-1.1.txt Bina

Re: Swiftfox license

2007-04-06 Thread Michael Pobega
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Fri, Apr 06, 2007 at 07:52:42AM +0200, Mike Hommey wrote: > On Thu, Apr 05, 2007 at 04:57:25PM -0400, Michael Pobega > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Thu, Apr 05, 2007 at 11:03:20AM -0500, Kilz _ wrote: > > > Hi Debian legal I am writing you to a

Re: Copyleft variation of MIT license

2007-04-06 Thread Suraj N. Kurapati
Gervase Markham wrote: > Suraj N. Kurapati wrote: >> I had been using the GPL for some years without fully understanding >> its implications. Recently, I spent some time thinking about my >> ethical beliefs regarding free software and discovered that I prefer >> something like Creative Commons' by-

Hinner EDV: Correct Logo Usage?

2007-04-06 Thread Toni Mueller
Hello, perchange I came across this web page: http://www.hinner.de/linux/ I was surprised that he uses the Official Logo instead of the Open Logo, and wrote to him about it, stating that my reading of this web page http://www.debian.org/logos/ and his web pages should generally not warran

Re: Hinner EDV: Correct Logo Usage?

2007-04-06 Thread Steve Langasek
On Fri, Apr 06, 2007 at 08:50:20PM +0200, Toni Mueller wrote: > perchange I came across this web page: > http://www.hinner.de/linux/ > I was surprised that he uses the Official Logo instead of the Open > Logo, and wrote to him about it, stating that my reading of this web > page > http://ww

Re: Swiftfox license

2007-04-06 Thread Dusty Wilson
I don't know if this makes any difference, but here's a quote and link for you. From http://getswiftfox.com/source.htm "[...] Yes, that makes Swiftfox "non-free" in the Debian sense but it will always be free of charge to all users. If anyone has a better solution I would be glad to hear it."

Re: Swiftfox license

2007-04-06 Thread Ben Finney
"Dusty Wilson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I don't know if this makes any difference, but here's a quote and > link for you. > > >From http://getswiftfox.com/source.htm > "[...] Yes, that makes Swiftfox "non-free" in the Debian sense but it > will always be free of charge to all users. If anyone