На Thu, 9 Nov 2006 21:55:58 +0100 Francesco Poli написа:
> It's not a matter of finding an "ultimate" form.
> It's a simple practical matter: if someone modifies a work in some
> form (because he/she prefers to do so), but only distributes another
> form (which is generated from the other one), th
* Rafael Laboissiere <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-11-09 10:59]:
> (4) How would the situation be if Octave were released under the LGPL?
I investigated this issue further and discovered that R (www.r-project.org),
which is released under the GPL, faced the same problem years ago. R
operates under t
On 10-Nov-2006, Rafael Laboissiere wrote:
| This is possible thanks to the changes made in the R licensing terms. From
| the announcement of the change (2001-Feb-05):
|
| It came to our attention that some projects are interpreting GPL to
| mean that compiling against the header files or
On 10-Nov-2006, Rafael Laboissiere wrote:
| I tend to think that such a change in Octave would be beneficial in many
| aspects, including for fostering the use of Octave in academia. I have
| already written Octave bindings for the CGAL (www.cgal.org) and the
| Cubpack++ (www.cs.kuleuven.ac.be/~n
On Fri, 10 Nov 2006 12:04:28 +0200 Yasen Pramatarov wrote:
>
> I guess my concern was that people could just start requiring large
> and unedited images. But you're right - the requirement will adjust
> itself according to the needs of the community :) Just like it got
> with the software source.
5 matches
Mail list logo
