Clarification about the octave-gpcl licensing conditions

I am confused about the the licensing conditions of the octave-gpcl package and I need some advise from the debian-legalers. I am both the upstream author and the maintainer of octave-gpcl. This package provides the Octave (www.octave.org) binding for the General Polygon Clipper library (http://w

Re: photo licenses

On Thu, 9 Nov 2006 09:53:49 +0200 Yasen Pramatarov wrote: > Wed, 8 Nov 2006 22:26:42 +0100 Francesco Poli : [...] > > The issue here is making available all the necessary data for > > modifying the work in an optimal way: doing otherwise puts the > > original author in an unfair p

Comments on the second public CC draft

Hi all! In a recent message[1] to the cc-licenses list, a new draft of CC-v3.0 licenses was announced. The message included some documents as attachments: * BY-NC-SA v 3 (102506) (US).pdf * BY-NC-SA v3 (102506) (unported).pdf [1] http://lists.ibiblio.org/pipermail/cc-licenses/2006-October/0044