Nathanael Nerode <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > http://lists.ibiblio.org/pipermail/cc-licenses/2006-August/003876.html
[...]
> The main motivation was to prevent license complication,
> *not* to prohibit parallel distribution.
> This is emphasized quite clearly in that message.
If they wanted to "prevent
Charles Fry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Can anyone comment on whether or not it is problematic for us to
> distribute a tiny icon of Firefox's logo? [...]
IIRC we have no current copyright permission for it, even in the browser
sources. So, yes, a problem. Can you ask Mozilla.org whether the logo
is a
Hello again,
Last tentative: what's wrong with my request that I don't get _any_ answer?
We have contacts within Sun with good will, we've got here a chance to
influence (employees from) Sun with constructive remarks, but I need
someone knowledgeable who helps me on the legal side, and tells me w
On Sat, Sep 23, 2006 at 12:32:07PM +0100, MJ Ray <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Charles Fry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Can anyone comment on whether or not it is problematic for us to
> > distribute a tiny icon of Firefox's logo? [...]
>
> IIRC we have no current copyright permission for it, even in th
Hi!
Did anyone read Creative Commons response to comments on CC-v3 draft(s)?
A PDF file was sent to the cc-licenses mailing list and can be found
here:
http://lists.ibiblio.org/pipermail/cc-licenses/2006-September/004027.html
The first comment is quoted below:
| One question that's come from De
Charles Fry schrieb:
Can anyone comment on whether or not it is problematic for us to
distribute a tiny icon of Firefox's logo? The only thing I could find
is:
http://www.mozilla.org/products/firefox/buttons.html
which says "Mozilla Firefox and the Firefox logo are trademarks of The
Mozilla
On Friday 22 September 2006 03:34, Markus Laire wrote:
> While the (current draft of) GPLv3 doesn't require you to give access
> to the source code in this case, it does allow an additional
> requirement which would require that (See section 7.b.4 below)
Your right, the provision does make things
[sent also to debian-legal for advice]
--- Bastian Blank <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> escreveu:
> On Fri, Sep 22, 2006 at 02:47:55PM -0300, Wagner Bruna wrote:
> > --- Bastian Blank <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> escreveu:
> >
> > > > Particularly, "public use" needs clarification:
> > > > "Copyright 1989 by Georgi
8 matches
Mail list logo