Re: Creative Commons 3.0 Public draft -- news and questions

2006-09-23 Thread MJ Ray
Nathanael Nerode <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > http://lists.ibiblio.org/pipermail/cc-licenses/2006-August/003876.html [...] > The main motivation was to prevent license complication, > *not* to prohibit parallel distribution. > This is emphasized quite clearly in that message. If they wanted to "prevent

Re: [Pkg-awstats-devel] Bug#388571: awstats: Non-free Firefox icon included

2006-09-23 Thread MJ Ray
Charles Fry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Can anyone comment on whether or not it is problematic for us to > distribute a tiny icon of Firefox's logo? [...] IIRC we have no current copyright permission for it, even in the browser sources. So, yes, a problem. Can you ask Mozilla.org whether the logo is a

Re: [Fwd: Re: Problem with license of msv-xsdlib]

2006-09-23 Thread Eric Lavarde - Debian
Hello again, Last tentative: what's wrong with my request that I don't get _any_ answer? We have contacts within Sun with good will, we've got here a chance to influence (employees from) Sun with constructive remarks, but I need someone knowledgeable who helps me on the legal side, and tells me w

Re: [Pkg-awstats-devel] Bug#388571: awstats: Non-free Firefox icon included

2006-09-23 Thread Mike Hommey
On Sat, Sep 23, 2006 at 12:32:07PM +0100, MJ Ray <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Charles Fry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Can anyone comment on whether or not it is problematic for us to > > distribute a tiny icon of Firefox's logo? [...] > > IIRC we have no current copyright permission for it, even in th

CC's responses to v3draft comments

2006-09-23 Thread Francesco Poli
Hi! Did anyone read Creative Commons response to comments on CC-v3 draft(s)? A PDF file was sent to the cc-licenses mailing list and can be found here: http://lists.ibiblio.org/pipermail/cc-licenses/2006-September/004027.html The first comment is quoted below: | One question that's come from De

Re: [Pkg-awstats-devel] Bug#388571: awstats: Non-free Firefox icon included

2006-09-23 Thread Michael Below
Charles Fry schrieb: Can anyone comment on whether or not it is problematic for us to distribute a tiny icon of Firefox's logo? The only thing I could find is: http://www.mozilla.org/products/firefox/buttons.html which says "Mozilla Firefox and the Firefox logo are trademarks of The Mozilla

Re: selling web application access

2006-09-23 Thread Sean Kellogg
On Friday 22 September 2006 03:34, Markus Laire wrote: > While the (current draft of) GPLv3 doesn't require you to give access > to the source code in this case, it does allow an additional > requirement which would require that (See section 7.b.4 below) Your right, the provision does make things

Re: Bug#388691: ibm-3270: Licensing issues

2006-09-23 Thread Wagner Bruna
[sent also to debian-legal for advice] --- Bastian Blank <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> escreveu: > On Fri, Sep 22, 2006 at 02:47:55PM -0300, Wagner Bruna wrote: > > --- Bastian Blank <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> escreveu: > > > > > > Particularly, "public use" needs clarification: > > > > "Copyright 1989 by Georgi