Dear All,
I am a Polish lawyer currently preparing a doctorate on the protection
of user freedoms.
I have written on the scope of GPLv2's copyleft clause under Polish law
(the link to the Polish version of the article is:
http://ksiewicz.net/?p=17, I am working at making my page bilingual and
the
Krzysztof Siewicz wrote:
> Art. 29 allows to quote fragments of already published works or small
> works in whole, if it may be explained by, inter alia, ???laws of the type
> of arts???.
Does Polish copyright law not have a restriction that the _purpose_
of the quote must be something like criti
Hi!
Arnoud Engelfriet napisał(a):
> Does Polish copyright law not have a restriction that the _purpose_
> of the quote must be something like criticism, announcement, debate
> and so on? That's what most countries have.
Yes it does - they are in the same art. 29: "to the extent justified by
expla
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Marco d'Itri) writes:
> On Aug 31, Nathanael Nerode <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> Marco trolled again. FYI, no serious person disagrees with this
>> interpretation.
> Except every other distribution, which usually retain real lawyers
> to advise them about potential problems
Hey all,
Scanning through the RC bug list and there seem to be a lot of bugs of
the form "foo is unsuitable for main because xyzzy license is non-free"
and "foo cannot be redistributed because of barbazquux".
I'm inclined to think there should be a regular tag for these bugs,
perhaps "licensing".
Hello,
I'm packaging Kadu program (www.kadu.net) for Debian and Ubuntu right now.
There's a problem with Kadu's license (GPLv2 or later), which conflicts
OpenSSL's license. When project started, upstream authors where not aware of
the conflict, so they didn't add a proper exception. However, n
On Sat, Sep 02, 2006 at 05:58:12PM +0200, Patryk Cisek wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I'm packaging Kadu program (www.kadu.net) for Debian and Ubuntu right now.
> There's a problem with Kadu's license (GPLv2 or later), which conflicts
> OpenSSL's license. When project started, upstream authors where not a
Patryk Cisek wrote:
> license? Well, they have rights to their patches, but copyright holder for
> Kadu is Kadu Team (http://www.kadu.net/wiki/index.php/English:Authors).
> Could someone, please, clarify this?
For license changes, the copyright holder(s) are the important ones.
If the Kadu tea
8 matches
Mail list logo
