Gervase Markham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> MJ Ray wrote:
> > It's the comment system which is incapable, not the people.
> > IMO there was no good reason to design some people out of it.
>
> If it's possible to provide the same level of function with an interface
> that works in more browsers, great -
MJ Ray wrote:
> Well, that's just great for the users who can see the UI without it
> spewing errors. Was there really no way to offer the same features to
> everyone in an easily-accessible way?
I don't know; you'd have to ask the designers. Although you are now
using the word "accessible" when
On Tue, Jun 13, 2006 at 03:11:42PM -0700, Adam McKenna wrote:
> If people who aren't members are raising valid concerns that need to be
> addressed before development can proceed, we shouldn't reject that input on
> the basis of membership and call it "blocking development".
Right. But it's also p
On Thu, Jun 15, 2006 at 10:27:08AM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
> it's also possible to raise a variety of invalid concerns
> in ways that require responses
> their comments are only influential in so far as they persuade developers.
These statements apply to both DD's and non-DD's.
--Adam
--
A
4 matches
Mail list logo
