Re: Debian & Cuba, again

2006-06-13 Thread Ying-Chun Liu (PaulLiu)
David Moreno Garza wrote: > Googling a bit, I've found a previous discussion on exporting Debian to > Cuba, which apparently it is not allowed, what does this *exactly* mean? > Maybe you are googling something outdated. I think it is OK now if you export Debian main only (without non-free/contrib

Re: Debian & Cuba, again

2006-06-13 Thread Florian Weimer
* Ying-Chun Liu: > David Moreno Garza wrote: >> Googling a bit, I've found a previous discussion on exporting Debian to >> Cuba, which apparently it is not allowed, what does this *exactly* mean? >> > > Maybe you are googling something outdated. I think it is OK now if you > export Debian main on

Re: Non-DD's in debian-legal

2006-06-13 Thread MJ Ray
Theodore Tso <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > The d-l list has a problem which is shared by many Debian mailing > lists (including debian-vote and debian-devel, and I'm sure it's not > limited to them) which is that far too many people subscribe to the > "last post wins" school of debate. People don't listen

Re: Non-DD's in debian-legal

2006-06-13 Thread MJ Ray
Thomas Bushnell BSG <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > I suspect that if it were confined to Debian developers, this problem > would be much reduced. Not eliminated, but reduced. On what is that suspicion based? I disagree. Some of the worst noiseboxes were DDs and some of the best moderators weren't. Rest

Re: Debian & Cuba, again

2006-06-13 Thread Walter Landry
"Ying-Chun Liu (PaulLiu)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > David Moreno Garza wrote: > > Googling a bit, I've found a previous discussion on exporting Debian to > > Cuba, which apparently it is not allowed, what does this *exactly* mean? > > > > Maybe you are googling something outdated. I think it i

Re: Packages containing RFCs

2006-06-13 Thread Justin Pryzby
On Thu, Apr 27, 2006 at 04:59:07PM +0200, Frank K?ster wrote: > Simon Josefsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Justin Pryzby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >> I *swear* that one of the project documents said something highly > >> relevant, to the effect of "nonfree material might be included in a

Re: Non-DD's in debian-legal

2006-06-13 Thread Adam McKenna
On Thu, Jun 08, 2006 at 03:02:03PM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote: > Personally, I think non-DDs participating is great; the only problem > comes when that starts becoming a way for people who aren't members > of the project to block development; which can happen either by people > spending time arguin

Re: Non-DD's in debian-legal

2006-06-13 Thread Adam McKenna
On Tue, Jun 13, 2006 at 03:11:42PM -0700, Adam McKenna wrote: > Likewise, there are plenty of DD's whose S/N ratio is pretty high, and are (pretty low, that is..) --Adam -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]