A GPL-compatible license for photos and music. Which?

2006-04-23 Thread NeuRoTiX
Hi to all the list. I'm looking for a license to use to release some photographic and music work I made. The license should be GPL-compatible in order to let anyone is making - for example - a GPL software to freely use my works. Also I would like that the access to my works (and derivatives) neve

Re: A GPL-compatible license for photos and music. Which?

2006-04-23 Thread Don Armstrong
On Sun, 23 Apr 2006, NeuRoTiX wrote: > I took a look to the Creative Commons but it seems to be a non > GPL-compatible license. Yes, most of the CC licenses (there are a few dozen of the things) are not GPL compatible. > I don't know if I can use the GPL itself because it's not possible > to iden

Re: A GPL-compatible license for photos and music. Which?

2006-04-23 Thread Ying-Chun Liu
Don Armstrong wrote: > On Sun, 23 Apr 2006, NeuRoTiX wrote: > >>I took a look to the Creative Commons but it seems to be a non >>GPL-compatible license. > > > Yes, most of the CC licenses (there are a few dozen of the things) are > not GPL compatible. > > I got a question. Why CC music/graphi

Re: A GPL-compatible license for photos and music. Which?

2006-04-23 Thread Francesco Poli
On Sun, 23 Apr 2006 13:31:19 GMT NeuRoTiX wrote: > > Hi to all the list. Hi! :) > I'm looking for a license to use to release some photographic and > music work I made. The license should be GPL-compatible in order to > let anyone is making - for example - a GPL software to freely use my > wor

Re: A GPL-compatible license for photos and music. Which?

2006-04-23 Thread olive
Francesco Poli wrote: So, think about your photographic work: which form would you start from, if you wanted to modify it? That is the source! For instance, if you take photographs with a digital camera that saves pictures in JPEG format, and want to publish those pictures, your source is proba

Re: A GPL-compatible license for photos and music. Which?

2006-04-23 Thread Andrew Donnellan
Of course GPL programs can *open* CC graphics, it's just you cannot *distribute* CC graphics with them if you want to be GPL-compatible. The GPL gives you unlimited permission to run the program using whatever data you want, whether free or proprietary, but not to combine the GPL program with a GPL

Re: License Licenses (again)....

2006-04-23 Thread Joe Smith
"Nathanael Nerode" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Javier wrote: The last proposed licensed I sent is *not* a "new" license. It is simply this license: http://www.freebsd.org/copyright/freebsd-doc-license.html ... The Debian Documentation License Copyright 1997-

Re: A GPL-compatible license for photos and music. Which?

2006-04-23 Thread Francesco Poli
On Sun, 23 Apr 2006 22:25:35 +0400 olive wrote: > Francesco Poli wrote: > > > > > So, think about your photographic work: which form would you start > > from, if you wanted to modify it? That is the source! > > For instance, if you take photographs with a digital camera that > > saves pictures i

Re: License Licenses (again)....

2006-04-23 Thread Benjamin Seidenberg
Joe Smith wrote: > > "Nathanael Nerode" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message > news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >> Javier wrote: >>> The last proposed licensed I sent is *not* a "new" license. It >>> is simply this license: >>> http://www.freebsd.org/copyright/freebsd-doc-license.html >> ... >> >>> The Debia