After cautiously reading you message, here are my intends about the listed
files. Please correct me if you think I'm wrong.
[CRUFT] Remove from any package
[NON-FREE] Move to non-free
[MAIN] Keep in main
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Nathanael Nerode) writes:
> Files in the /etc directory of emacs21 whi
Has anyone looked at Disney's "Panda3d Public License Version 2.0"?
http://www.panda3d.org/license.php
Clause 4 seems worrysome (requires sending signifigant changes to Disney).
Other parts seem redundant with copyright law.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "
"Arc Riley" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Has anyone looked at Disney's "Panda3d Public License Version 2.0"?
http://www.panda3d.org/license.php
Clause 4 seems worrysome (requires sending signifigant changes to Disney).
Other parts seem redundant with copyright
Hi,
Frank said:
> assume a document licensed under GFDL, with no invariant sections (and
> ...) has a front cover text (like "A GNU Manual") and a back cover text
[...]
> What should the developers do in order to make it DFSG-free [...]
This implies that a document with no invariant sections,
Steve M. Robbins wrote:
> Frank said:
>> assume a document licensed under GFDL, with no invariant sections (and
>> ...) has a front cover text (like "A GNU Manual") and a back cover text
> [...]
>> What should the developers do in order to make it DFSG-free [...]
>
> This implies that a document
Jérôme Marant wrote:
> After cautiously reading you message, here are my intends about the listed
> files. Please correct me if you think I'm wrong.
>
> [CRUFT] Remove from any package
> [NON-FREE] Move to non-free
> [MAIN] Keep in main
I agree with all of these, except:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] (N
Steve M. Robbins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> This implies that a document with no invariant sections, but with
> one-sentence front- and back-cover sections does not meet the DFSG?
> Is that Debian's position?
Debian's position is:
: that works that don't include any Invariant Sections, Cover Texts,
: A
Raul Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> It's not clear to me that the GFDL prohibits DRM where
> a parallel distribution mechanism is guaranteed to be available.
The copying to the DRM-controlled media seems expressly prohibited.
> If free parallel distribution is guaranteed to be available,
> relevant
Francesco Poli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> On the other hand, "kernel-image-2.6.8-2-386.deb by the Debian kernel
> team, based on the Linux kernel by Linus Torvalds and others" seems to
> be accurate credit, doesn't it?
It's an arguably accurate description, but strikes me as an arguably
misleading cred
Francesco Poli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> On Wed, 22 Mar 2006 11:28:03 + MJ Ray wrote:
> > Long term, hosting it yourself under a distributed RCS and using
> > something like DOAP to keep project metadata seems the best bet. If
> > others would like to help document the tools and methods, please le
On 3/25/06, MJ Ray <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Raul Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > It's not clear to me that the GFDL prohibits DRM where
> > a parallel distribution mechanism is guaranteed to be available.
>
> The copying to the DRM-controlled media seems expressly prohibited.
Only if these copi
11 matches
Mail list logo
