Re: [Flamerobin-devel] License, again

2006-03-24 Thread milanb
Quoting Don Armstrong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > The GPL itself covers these points. In principle, debian-legal discourages >license proliferation. GPL does cover it, but GPL requires that modifications are made public. We don't want that. The GPL does not require this. I re-read GPL today (afte

Re: [Flamerobin-devel] License, again

2006-03-24 Thread Jacobo Tarrio
El jueves, 23 de marzo de 2006 a las 22:59:46 +0100, Milan Babuskov escribía: > > The GPL itself covers these points. In principle, debian-legal discourages > >license proliferation. > GPL does cover it, but GPL requires that modifications are made public. No, it does not. It only requires that,

Re: [Flamerobin-devel] License, again

2006-03-24 Thread Jacobo Tarrio
El viernes, 24 de marzo de 2006 a las 10:18:14 +0100, Jacobo Tarrio escribía: > Licenses that require that modifications are published are routinely > rejected by Debian. More properly, "Works distributed under licenses that..." -- Jacobo Tarrío | http://jacobo.tarrio.org/ -- To

Re: FYI: Savannah seems to reject "GPLv2 only" projects

2006-03-24 Thread Florent Bayle
Le Vendredi 24 Mars 2006 01:07, Francesco Poli a écrit : [...] > On the other hand, TuxFamily seems rather interesting. > One problem that _I_ have with TuxFamily is that almost all the web site > texts are in French only: I speak Italian and English, but not quite > French (I can manage to underst

ttf-dejavu and Bitstream's license (bug#353462)

2006-03-24 Thread Peter Černák
Hello, I'm searching legal advice about the no-advertising clause in Bitstream's license as summarized in the following bug report. -- Peter -- Forwarded message -- From: Christian Hammers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: 18.2.2006 19:43 Subject: Bug#353462: ttf-dejavu: license prohibit

Re: cdrtools - GPL code with CDDL build system

2006-03-24 Thread Francesco Poli
On Fri, 24 Mar 2006 01:28:37 + Måns Rullgård wrote: > Francesco Poli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > On Tue, 21 Mar 2006 18:19:52 +0100 Eduard Bloch wrote: > > > >> Don't count much on dvdrtools, it has no active upstream at all > >> (no, I don't mean the guys whoes only heroic act was the

Re: FYI: Savannah seems to reject "GPLv2 only" projects

2006-03-24 Thread Francesco Poli
On Fri, 24 Mar 2006 17:22:32 +0100 Florent Bayle wrote: > Le Vendredi 24 Mars 2006 01:07, Francesco Poli a écrit : > [...] > > On the other hand, TuxFamily seems rather interesting. > > One problem that _I_ have with TuxFamily is that almost all the web > > site texts are in French only: I speak I