Henning Makholm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Scripsit Frank Küster <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
How do you fix errors in the document?
>
>> By waiting for upstream to release a new version.
>
> Even though _you_ may not want to take the time to fix errors, it is
> essential for freedom that _the use
MJ Ray <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Frank K=FCster asked:
>> Does debian-legal think that a
>> document with a DFSG-free license and with sources available except for
>> the embedded fonts is DFSG-free or not?
>
> I don't think a binary file follows the DFSG as a whole if it
> contains fonts which
Mark Rafn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Walter Landry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> Also, everything in orig.tar.gz must be DFSG free.
>
> On Thu, 2 Mar 2006, Frank Küster wrote:
>> Err, of course. That's why I ask. Does debian-legal think that a
>> document with a DFSG-free license and with so
Frank K=3DFCster asked:
> > Sorry not to give the answer you wanted.
>
> Err, excuse me? [...]
I missed the word "sooner" from the end of that and it seems to
have totally changed the meaning. I didn't mean to suggest that
you wanted a particular answer, just an answer.
Sorry for being unclear,
Marco d'Itri wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Err, of course. That's why I ask. Does debian-legal think that a
document with a DFSG-free license and with sources available except for
the embedded fonts is DFSG-free or not?
I can't see anything in the DFSG which would forbid it, so it looks
olive <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I think that the interpretation is that the DFSG applies to the fonts
> also. Indeed in this case, you cannot regenerate the same pdf file
> with tools from main. Quite often I agree with you that the DFSG are
> interpreted too strictly and does not refer the ori
Mike Hommey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Thu, Mar 02, 2006 at 08:39:32PM -0500, Arc Riley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> > I'm not saying the patent issue should be ignored. It just strikes me
>> > as silly to even start comparing Theora with H.264.
>>
>> Certain graphic artists would say the
On Fri, 03 Mar 2006 10:25:24 +0100 Frank Küster wrote:
> Henning Makholm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Scripsit Frank Küster <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >
> How do you fix errors in the document?
> >
> >> By waiting for upstream to release a new version.
> >
> > Even though _you_ may not want t
On Thu, 2 Mar 2006 20:39:32 -0500 Arc Riley wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 03, 2006 at 12:09:39AM +, M?ns Rullg?rd wrote:
[...]
> > The patent situation is unfortunate. Nevertheless, the H.264 codec
> > is being adopted by broadcasters throughout the world. For good or
> > bad, the codec is here to st
On Thu, 2 Mar 2006 18:01:55 -0500 Arc Riley wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 02, 2006 at 10:45:12PM +, M?ns Rullg?rd wrote:
[...]
> > That said, VP3/Theora can hardly compare with H.264 in terms of
> > coding efficiency. There really is no viable alternative in some
> > situations. Microsoft's WMV9/VC1 c
Hi,
> Can you please identify yourself as someone who has legal qualification to
> make the following assertions. I am concerned that any arbitrary Debian user
> can take offence to our license without reasonable legal grounds. I simply
> do not know who you are.
I am a Debian Developer; witho
11 matches
Mail list logo
