[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>The current Open Font License appears to have excessive restrictions
>upon the names of modified works. The Gentium font licence in particular
>reserves these terms:
While this may be annoying, I can't see why it should not be DFSG-free.
--
ciao,
Marco
--
To UNSUBSCR
Charles Fry
> The one big thing that everyone in this thread has missed is that we are
> trying to establish the utility of this licence to software explicitely
> distributed by the PHP Group at php.net in Pear or Pecl.
Distributing it doesn't mean much. They don't hold the copyright to
all the pa
We are seeking advice on how to proceed about an upstream tarball
distribution issue. The Debian Octave Group is planning to package the
SUNDIALS library (http://www.llnl.gov/CASC/sundials/main.html) for
integration into Octave. This package is released under a BSD License
(http://www.llnl.gov/CA
Rafael Laboissiere wrote:
> The problem is that prior to downloading the tarball (at
> http://www.llnl.gov/CASC/sundials/download/download.html), the user is
> asked to fill a form in a web page. Our question is: does this
> restriction decrease somehow the freeness of the package? If yes, how
>
Hello,
On Tuesday 29 November 2005 16:52, Rafael Laboissiere wrote:
> We are seeking advice on how to proceed about an upstream tarball
> distribution issue. The Debian Octave Group is planning to package the
> SUNDIALS library (http://www.llnl.gov/CASC/sundials/main.html) for
> integration into
The webforms are compulsory *for downloading the software from their
site*. Doesn't affect the package in any way at all though.
andrew
On 11/30/05, Andrey Romanenko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On Tuesday 29 November 2005 16:52, Rafael Laboissiere wrote:
> > We are seeking advice on h
Hi,
I package "icc-profiles" - a collection of color profiles suitable for usage
with color management enabled software like The Gimp, Scribus, and CinePaint.
Among the people involved in this area several "classic" Adobe ICC profiles
have been in high standing for a long time. Adobe just released
I need to package tiffio (http://artis.imag.fr/Software/TiffIO/) either
together with my "lprof" package or separately to enable lprof libtiff4
access. TiffIO is covered by a non-standard license full text of which is
listed below. My analysis of the license has shown that I can easily bundle it
wi
On Fri, Nov 25, 2005 at 10:57:31PM +0100, Claudio Moratti wrote:
> Hi!
> some weeks ago I sent a message about kleansweeb trademark issue...
>
> I recived one aswer
> (http://lists.debian.org/debian-legal/2005/10/msg00040.html)... thanks :D
>
> the problem is... I sent a request to upstream auth
While Firefox itself is licensed under a free license, there's an issue
in the way the Mozilla foundation designed it to include their own
package system for extensions and themes.
Take Firefox 1.5 for example, I've had it for a few hours, downloaded a
few extensions.. whoops. Looking at the r
10 matches
Mail list logo
