Re: Please review: The OFL (Open Font License)

2005-11-19 Thread Florian Weimer
* Nicolas Spalinger: > Hi folks, > > Please tell us what you think of the Open Font License. > > All the details are available at: > http://scripts.sil.org/OFL | 1) Neither the Font Software nor any of its individual components, in |Standard or Modified Versions, may be sold by itself. This

Re: Please review: The OFL (Open Font License)

2005-11-19 Thread MJ Ray
Nicolas Spalinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > All the details are available at: > http://scripts.sil.org/OFL The page is not very accessible because you set color without a background-color (set both or preferably neither, please) and you seem to be using 8pt body text (ow). It's really not nice to make

Re: Please review: The OFL (Open Font License)

2005-11-19 Thread Henning Makholm
Scripsit Florian Weimer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > | 1) Neither the Font Software nor any of its individual components, in > |Standard or Modified Versions, may be sold by itself. > This clause is not quite DFSG-free, but it is so easy to work around > it so that it's probably not a real issue. I

Re: Please review: The OFL (Open Font License)

2005-11-19 Thread Nathanael Nerode
Nicolas Spalinger wrote: > Hi folks, > > Please tell us what you think of the Open Font License. > > All the details are available at: > http://scripts.sil.org/OFL > > This page includes a FAQ and other docs explaining the rationale behind > the license, what we want to achieve by freeing up