Andrew Donnellan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (07/11/2005):
> Is this spam email spam? I would think that you couldn't really
> copyright an email address. And who exactly is this spam from? If they
> are requesting something they should be traceable. Also, are other
> consultants getting the same? Is it re
The site seems legit, but that doesn't make spamming legal. To be
spam, however, it must be automated. It looks like a site for 'open
source' programmers, and Debian clearly qualifies as an 'open source'
project (in fact the OSD was based on the DFSG), so it may have been
manually sent. I would jus
Andrew Donnellan wrote:
The site seems legit, but that doesn't make spamming legal. To be
spam, however, it must be automated. It looks like a site for 'open
source' programmers, and Debian clearly qualifies as an 'open source'
project (in fact the OSD was based on the DFSG), so it may have been
On 11/17/05, Benjamin Seidenberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I thought spam was unsolicited email, automatic or not?
>
> Cheers,
> Benjamin
This would mean most email is spam, because most email is unsolicited.
However it's not spam because I agree to receive emails.
According to the Australia
Dear Debian legal,
I'm about to release some SW I've been working on for some years under a
GPL licence and have a few questions:
- Which text to include in the files? Is the following OK?
* Author: xx yy
* Copyright : xx yy, 2000-2005
* License : GNU GPLv2 or later
* This program is fr
> - Which text to include in the files? Is the following OK?
> * Author: xx yy
> * Copyright : xx yy, 2000-2005
> * License : GNU GPLv2 or later
> * This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify
> * it under the terms of the GNU General Public License version 2 as
On Thu, Nov 17, 2005 at 12:12:53AM +0100, Svante Signell wrote:
> I'm about to release some SW I've been working on for some years under a
> GPL licence and have a few questions:
>
> - Which text to include in the files? Is the following OK?
This looks good to me.
> * Author: xx yy
> * Copy
On Wed, Nov 16, 2005 at 06:47:06PM -0500, pryzbyj wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 17, 2005 at 12:12:53AM +0100, Svante Signell wrote:
> The idea is to make a code audit easy; grep -A4 -B4 -ir copyright can
> be done on a fairly large source tree without too much trouble, but
> its crazy disappointing if you l
Svante Signell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I'm about to release some SW I've been working on for some years under a
> GPL licence and have a few questions:
[...]
Most of these questions are answered here:
http://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl-howto.html
--
Captain Logic is not steering this tugboa
9 matches
Mail list logo
