It's not all that unusual for conferences to require that the material
submitted for the conference be licensed in a specific manner; if you
plan on presenting, some DFSG free license of the material you present
should be expected so portions of the work can be utilized in main or
otherwise distrib
Lionel Elie Mamane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > http://lists.debian.org/debian-legal/2002/05/msg00108.html
>
> I don't see a conclusive answer in that discussion; only doubt and
> "didn't find any proof that this restriction still holds". I'd prefer
> if we could find a specific abrogation of the rest
On Fri, Nov 11, 2005 at 03:26:58PM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
> Why fight at all? If having a free license is so obviously correct, why
> force people to do it? If some people are uncomfortable with it, why
> fight that?
Even within Debian, it's become clear to me that, if we want DFSG-free
thing
On 11/8/05, Lionel Elie Mamane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 08, 2005 at 06:03:45PM +, W. Borgert wrote:
> > On Tue, Nov 08, 2005 at 06:16:52PM +0100, Lionel Elie Mamane wrote:
>
> >> This makes the KJV of the bible non-free in GB and probably even
> >> illegal to distribute at all i
Thank you for subscribing. You have now unsubscribed and no more messages will
be sent.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
"Niko Tyni" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Fine. So, as I understand, the only possible problem is documentation,
since the license doesn't explicitly give permission to modify it or
distribute modified versions. It's only speaking of 'the code'.
All the documentat
> And your argument is flawed. God himself didn't directly author any
> part of the Bible at all. ;-) According to Christian doctrine, God
> *inspired* various people to write the *entire Bible*. According to
> Jewish doctrine, the same holds true for the Torah.
>
> The KJV of the Bible was orig
On Fri, 11 Nov 2005 15:26:58 +1000 Anthony Towns wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 10, 2005 at 07:49:36PM -0500, Glenn Maynard wrote:
> > FYI, a possible response might be: "we care about freeness, but we
> > pick our battle, and our battle is Debian main". I care about
> > starving children, but I don't dona
On Fri, Nov 11, 2005 at 08:00:55AM -0500, Glenn Maynard wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 11, 2005 at 03:26:58PM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
> > Why fight at all? If having a free license is so obviously correct, why
> > force people to do it? If some people are uncomfortable with it, why
> > fight that?
> Even
On Fri, Nov 11, 2005 at 12:49:21AM -0800, Don Armstrong wrote:
> It's not all that unusual for conferences to require that the material
> submitted for the conference be licensed in a specific manner;
OTOH, conferences usually ask for the minimal permission they actually
need to do their job.
>
On Sat, 12 Nov 2005, Anthony Towns wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 11, 2005 at 12:49:21AM -0800, Don Armstrong wrote:
> > It's not all that unusual for conferences to require that the material
> > submitted for the conference be licensed in a specific manner;
>
> OTOH, conferences usually ask for the minima
On Sat, Nov 12, 2005 at 10:46:24AM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
> Of course, within Debian DFSG-freeness isn't mandatory or enforced: you
> can upload to non-free instead of main just by tweaking your control file.
The response is predictable, but here it is anyway: non-free isn't within
Debian; De
I am working on the packaging of the kdeadmin module of kde 3.5, and it
contains a new application, knetworkconf. This application has backends
for 15 different gnu/linux and bsd distributions, and it contains 20x20
pixel logos of each of them. By default, the built package includes all
the i
On Sat, 12 Nov 2005 10:26:52 +1000, Anthony Towns
said:
> On Fri, Nov 11, 2005 at 12:49:21AM -0800, Don Armstrong wrote:
>> [If this poses a problem,[1] you always have the option of not
>> presenting, or presenting your work in an informal session.]
> *sigh*
> Does this really have to devolv
On Fri, 11 Nov 2005 15:26:58 +1000, Anthony Towns
said:
> On Thu, Nov 10, 2005 at 07:49:36PM -0500, Glenn Maynard wrote:
>> FYI, a possible response might be: "we care about freeness, but we
>> pick our battle, and our battle is Debian main". I care about
>> starving children, but I don't dona
On Sat, 12 Nov 2005 10:46:24 +1000, Anthony Towns
said:
> On Fri, Nov 11, 2005 at 08:00:55AM -0500, Glenn Maynard wrote:
>> On Fri, Nov 11, 2005 at 03:26:58PM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
>> > Why fight at all? If having a free license is so obviously
>> > correct, why force people to do it? If
16 matches
Mail list logo
