Hi,
is this clause a problem?
* Copyright (C) 1994-1999 RSA Security Inc. Licence to copy this document
* is granted provided that it is identified as "RSA Security In.c Public-Key
* Cryptography Standards (PKCS)" in all material mentioning or referencing
* this document.
this is a from a hea
Michael Poole <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> MJ Ray writes:
> > The meaning should be exactly the same: the previous and known
> > expression leads one to pick from a limited (but maybe large)
> > number of ways to write a second expression that makes sense,
> > and it is written in one of those ways
Andreas Jellinghaus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> * Copyright (C) 1994-1999 RSA Security Inc. Licence to copy this document
> * is granted provided that it is identified as "RSA Security In.c Public-Key
> * Cryptography Standards (PKCS)" in all material mentioning or referencing
> * this documen
Don Armstrong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> People who see that it is a problem have to take up the gauntlet;
> Indeed, one could ask what the contributors to this thread have
> been doing to speed this process along...
I think people have to consider it worth working to fix too. An
impression that
On Sunday 02 October 2005 20:26, George Danchev wrote:
[...]
> 1) lib/iLBC - lisenced under Global IP Sound iLBC Public License, v2.0 -
> IETF Version which is non-free [2] - will be tricky, but doable I think.
[...]
> [2] http://lists.debian.org/debian-legal/2005/10/msg2.html
All,
I have ha
On Mon, 03 Oct 2005, MJ Ray wrote:
> Don Armstrong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > People who see that it is a problem have to take up the gauntlet;
> > Indeed, one could ask what the contributors to this thread have
> > been doing to speed this process along...
>
> I don't care enough about a wiki
On Sun, 2 Oct 2005 15:38:11 -0700 Don Armstrong wrote:
> On Sun, 02 Oct 2005, Francesco Poli wrote:
> > On the other hand (but note that this does not in any way rely on
> > "Fair Use"), the old wiki maintainers have permission to publish the
> > material. If the new wiki is set up by the same peo
On Sun, Sep 18, 2005 at 09:32:27AM -0400, Joe Smith wrote:
Hi
Thanks a lot for the information which has been collected in this thread.
> Has anybody sought clarification from JPL about the case where standard
> media credit lines do not apply?
I tried to contact JPL because of the problem bu
On Mon, 03 Oct 2005, Francesco Poli wrote:
> On Sun, 2 Oct 2005 15:38:11 -0700 Don Armstrong wrote:
> > On Sun, 02 Oct 2005, Francesco Poli wrote:
> > > If that allow public users to get the source form of the wiki
> > > content through the same medium (http) they use for accessing the
> > > wiki i
Francesco Poli wrote:
On Sun, 2 Oct 2005 15:38:11 -0700 Don Armstrong wrote:
On Sun, 02 Oct 2005, Francesco Poli wrote:
If that allow public users to get the source form of the wiki
content through the same medium (http) they use for accessing the
wiki itself, that's fine.
No, it would be thr
10 matches
Mail list logo
