Re: [PEAR-QA] PHP License

On Wed, August 24, 2005 02:39, Alan Knowles wrote: > While I agree we probably need to review 3-5.. It may be worth > reminding debial-legal that AFAIK packages like phpgroupware, phpbb etc. > violate the PHP licence.. So I do hope they are addressing those issues > with as much vigor... ;) I don

Re: [PEAR-DEV] PHP License

Ian Eure <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> 6. Redistributions of any form whatsoever must retain the following >> acknowledgment: "This product includes PHP, freely available from >> ". >> >> Ouch. This means that I can't distribute a PEAR module released under >> the PHP L

Re: [PEAR-QA] PHP License

On Wed, August 24, 2005 10:20, Joe Stump wrote: > On Aug 24, 2005, at 12:41 AM, Thijs Kinkhorst wrote: > >> On Wed, August 24, 2005 02:39, Alan Knowles wrote: >> >>> While I agree we probably need to review 3-5.. It may be worth >>> reminding debial-legal that AFAIK packages like phpgroupware, >>>

Re: [PEAR-QA] PHP License

He's referencing the passage that mentions that you can't use "PHP" in your package name. If you called it "BB of PHP" it would be fine. --Joe On Aug 24, 2005, at 12:41 AM, Thijs Kinkhorst wrote: On Wed, August 24, 2005 02:39, Alan Knowles wrote: While I agree we probably need to review 3

Re: Rules for submitting licenses for review

On 24/08/05, Ken Arromdee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Tue, 23 Aug 2005, Raul Miller wrote: > > > The problem is that the GPL says "if you obey this license, you can do > > > these > > > things that you otherwise can't do". > > > The OGL says "if you obey this license, you can do these things t

Re: [PEAR-QA] PHP License

hi folks, On Wed, Aug 24, 2005 at 10:38:23AM +0200, Thijs Kinkhorst wrote: > > He's referencing the passage that mentions that you can't use "PHP" > > in your package name. If you called it "BB of PHP" it would be fine. > > I fail to understand why the licence under which the PHP programming > la

Re: [PEAR-QA] PHP License

On Wednesday 24 August 2005 01:38 am, Thijs Kinkhorst wrote: > I fail to understand why the licence under which the PHP programming > language resorts, can govern software under the GPL, since the PHP licence > only mentions derivative works, not applications written in that > programming language.

Re: [PEAR-QA] PHP License

Sean Kellogg wrote: On Wednesday 24 August 2005 01:38 am, Thijs Kinkhorst wrote: I fail to understand why the licence under which the PHP programming language resorts, can govern software under the GPL, since the PHP licence only mentions derivative works, not applications written in that pr

hello

ALERT!!! This e-mail contained one or more infected files. The following attachments were infected and have been repaired: No attachments are in this category. The following infected attachments were deleted: No attachments are in this category. The following infected attachments were blocked b

Re: [PEAR-QA] PHP License

On Wednesday 24 August 2005 01:46 pm, Catatonic Porpoise wrote: > Sean Kellogg wrote: > >I'm pretty sure it is a PHP-derivative. It relies on all sorts of built > > in PHP functions to create the finished work. Perhaps... PERHAPS... > > the code you download for phpbb, on its own, MIGHT be a se

Re: [PEAR-QA] PHP License

Sean Kellogg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Wednesday 24 August 2005 01:46 pm, Catatonic Porpoise wrote: >> Sean Kellogg wrote: >> >I'm pretty sure it is a PHP-derivative. It relies on all sorts of built >> > in PHP functions to create the finished work. Perhaps... PERHAPS... >> > the code y

Re: [PEAR-QA] PHP License

On Wednesday 24 August 2005 02:17 pm, Måns Rullgård wrote: > Sean Kellogg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > On Wednesday 24 August 2005 01:46 pm, Catatonic Porpoise wrote: > >> Sean Kellogg wrote: > >> >I'm pretty sure it is a PHP-derivative. It relies on all sorts of > >> > built in PHP functions t

Re: [PEAR-QA] PHP License

Sean Kellogg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Wednesday 24 August 2005 02:17 pm, Måns Rullgård wrote: >> Sean Kellogg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> > On Wednesday 24 August 2005 01:46 pm, Catatonic Porpoise wrote: >> >> Sean Kellogg wrote: >> >> >I'm pretty sure it is a PHP-derivative. It relies

Re: [PEAR-QA] PHP License

On Wednesday 24 August 2005 03:44 pm, Måns Rullgård wrote: > Sean Kellogg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > On Wednesday 24 August 2005 02:17 pm, Måns Rullgård wrote: > >> Sean Kellogg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >> > On Wednesday 24 August 2005 01:46 pm, Catatonic Porpoise wrote: > >> >> Sean Kell