Re: removing the debian-legal website stuff?

2005-05-26 Thread Joerg Jaspert
On 10298 March 1977, Frank Lichtenheld wrote: > As some of you might know some time ago I created a web page for > listing information about licenses discussed by debian-legal > at http://www.debian.org/legal/licenses/ > Since this hasn't really worked out I propose to delete this stuff again > u

For professional documents use professional software...

2005-05-26 Thread Benedict
You best friends and family deserve the BEST internet photo album! http://lgxt.0pmf3z0tfs0pf10.gastmjgast6.com War is a series of catastrophes that results in a victory. Life shrinks or expands in proportion to one's courage. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subj

Re: removing the debian-legal website stuff?

2005-05-26 Thread MJ Ray
Joerg Jaspert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I would love that page working (ie new license summaries added). Would, for= > some > obscure license crap make my life easier if such a thing appears in > NEW. :) > But then it should be maintained, and I know that its impossible to get > something usefu

Re: broadcom proposed firmware licence, please comment ...

2005-05-26 Thread Sven Luther
On Wed, May 25, 2005 at 08:53:44PM -0700, Don Armstrong wrote: > On Wed, 25 May 2005, Sven Luther wrote: > > > + * Permission is hereby granted for the distribution of this firmware > > > data > > > + * in hexadecimal or equivalent format, provided this copyright notice is > > > + * accompanying i

Dude check out this sweet site!

2005-05-26 Thread Margaret
Penis Enlargement announcement http://www.toonu.net/ss/ Vote early and vote often. We teach them proper principles and let them govern themselves. Whatever advice you give, be brief. War is a series of catastrophes that results in a victory. Girls are always running throug

Re: License question about regexplorer

2005-05-26 Thread Francesco Poli
On Tue, 24 May 2005 08:48:49 -0500 Bill Allombert wrote: > On Sun, May 22, 2005 at 07:55:52PM +0100, Matthew Garrett wrote: > > > > Could we at least wait until post-Helsinki? There's a session on the > > DFSG planned, and it would be helpful to gain a better idea of what > > the not-on-legal par

Re: License question about regexplorer

2005-05-26 Thread Francesco Poli
On Tue, 24 May 2005 15:53:29 +0100 Matthew Garrett wrote: > Bill Allombert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > I disagree with that. Debian is an online organisation and > > discussion and decision need to happen online. Noone is prevented to > > read debian-legal. > > People are heavily discourag

Re: removing the debian-legal website stuff?

2005-05-26 Thread Francesco Poli
On Tue, 24 May 2005 02:33:02 +0100 MJ Ray wrote: > Frank Lichtenheld wrote: > > Shortly after creation this stalled however as nobody created > > summaries anymore, probably because for many discussions it proved > > to be difficult if not imopossible to summarise many of the > > discussions witho

Re: Revamping the debian-legal website (was Re: removing the debian-legal website stuff?

2005-05-26 Thread Francesco Poli
On Mon, 23 May 2005 19:20:42 -0400 Nathanael Nerode wrote: > Frank Lichtenfeld wrote: > >Since this hasn't really worked out I propose to delete this stuff > >again until someone comes up with a better idea how to better present > >the work of debian-legal. > > It would really, really, really hel

Re: broadcom proposed firmware licence, please comment ...

2005-05-26 Thread Michael K. Edwards
On 5/26/05, Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Wed, May 25, 2005 at 08:53:44PM -0700, Don Armstrong wrote: > > Would we actually be distributing the hexadecimal format, or would we > > be distributing the packed binary[1] representation of the hexadecimal > > format? > > I guess that if t

Re: removing the debian-legal website stuff?

2005-05-26 Thread MJ Ray
Francesco Poli wrote: > I hope that we can find a better way to keep track of past debian-legal > discussions: otherwise we are at risk of forgetting the issues that were > discovered and/or deciding in inconsistent ways about similar clauses... I've noted before that it sounds to me more like a c

Re: Quagga / GPL discussion effectively over?

2005-05-26 Thread Francesco Poli
On 25 May 2005 10:24:32 GMT MJ Ray wrote: > There's too much noise, not enough signal, each > of you endlessly rebutting the other point-by-point. I agree: I stopped following those very long and hard-to-read discussions a while ago, so anything useful buried in them is lost to me... :-( --

Re: broadcom proposed firmware licence, please comment ...

2005-05-26 Thread Sven Luther
On Thu, May 26, 2005 at 09:31:39AM -0700, Michael K. Edwards wrote: > In any case, if it comes to exist, that particular > "license-on-bundled-bits.txt" file should be copied into each binary > deb's directory under /usr/share/doc. This would be comfortably > within the meaning of "accompanying" t

Re: broadcom proposed firmware licence, please comment ...

2005-05-26 Thread Michael K. Edwards
On 5/26/05, Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Well, the initrd image, and more plainly the d-i .udebs are in question here. Is the GPL in the .udeb (or elsewhere in d-i)? If so, the putative "license-on-bundled-bits.txt" should go in as well. Cheers, - Michael

Re: broadcom proposed firmware licence, please comment ...

2005-05-26 Thread Joey Hess
Michael K. Edwards wrote: > Is the GPL in the .udeb (or elsewhere in d-i)? No. -- see shy jo signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Re: broadcom proposed firmware licence, please comment ...

2005-05-26 Thread Don Armstrong
On Thu, 26 May 2005, Sven Luther wrote: > On Wed, May 25, 2005 at 08:53:44PM -0700, Don Armstrong wrote: > > On Wed, 25 May 2005, Sven Luther wrote: > > > > + * Permission is hereby granted for the distribution of this firmware > > > > data > > > > + * in hexadecimal or equivalent format, provided

Re: broadcom proposed firmware licence, please comment ...

2005-05-26 Thread Raul Miller
On 5/26/05, Don Armstrong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Thu, 26 May 2005, Sven Luther wrote: > > 2) distribution as part of a binary module, without necessarily > > any copyright notice attached, which would be a pain. Since the > > GPL gives access to the source of the driver when the bina

Re: License question about regexplorer

2005-05-26 Thread Matthew Garrett
Francesco Poli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Please try and avoid non-costructive criticism. > It's true that debian-legal often experiences what can be seen as > "noise" or "interesting discussions", depending on your point of view, > mood, and temperature... but calling it "masturbation" is a bit

Grab any d-v-d. (with any encryption) to you computer.

2005-05-26 Thread Kenneth
Double Whammy http://www.get4fast.com/ Lynch Jaywalk Hocus Pocus The ability to quote is a serviceable substitute for wit. Off The Cuff Growing old is mandatory; growing up is optional!! -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PR

Re: Request for a sponsor for Felix

2005-05-26 Thread Roberto C. Sanchez
On Fri, May 27, 2005 at 10:44:49AM +1000, John Skaller wrote: > > Felix is a 'free for any use' open source advanced License text [0]: Licence Copyright (C) 2004 John Skaller. Felix is Free For Any Use. Redistribution and use in source and binary forms, with or without m

Re: Request for a sponsor for Felix

2005-05-26 Thread Måns Rullgård
"Roberto C. Sanchez" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Fri, May 27, 2005 at 10:44:49AM +1000, John Skaller wrote: >> >> Felix is a 'free for any use' open source advanced > > License text [0]: > > > > Licence > > Copyright (C) 2004 John Skaller. > > Felix is Free For Any Use.

Re: Request for a sponsor for Felix

2005-05-26 Thread John Skaller
On Thu, 2005-05-26 at 21:33 -0400, Roberto C. Sanchez wrote: > On Fri, May 27, 2005 at 10:44:49AM +1000, John Skaller wrote: > > > > Felix is a 'free for any use' open source advanced > Copyright (C) 2004 John Skaller. > > Felix is Free For Any Use. > > Redistribution and use in source and bina

We are one of the world leading legal sources for male impotence treatments

2005-05-26 Thread Clem
One stop store for best levitra buy. http://rouym.o39hap6zlyoea76.wisnjwis7.com Let every man be respected as an individual and no man idolized. How much easier it is to be critical than to be correct. CANONICALS, n. The motley worm by Jesters of the Court of Heaven. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, e