Why UCB dropped the OAC [was: Re: flowc license]

2005-02-13 Thread Francesco Poli
On Sat, 12 Feb 2005 12:26:24 -0500 Glenn Maynard wrote: > I don't quite know what you mean: I think he was asking for the > rationale for dropping the advertising clause, which you won't find in > the license texts. Yes, I was. > > ftp://ftp.cs.berkeley.edu/pub/4bsd/README.Impt.License.Change d

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED]: I-D ACTION:draft-bradner-rfc-extracts-00.txt]

2005-02-13 Thread Andrew Suffield
On Sun, Feb 13, 2005 at 01:29:26AM +0100, Simon Josefsson wrote: > and instead of assuming > people disagree with you,, assume they don't understand your position. That sounds like a recipie for being patronising. *I* understand "their" position just fine, I just find it disgusting. -- .''`.

Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED]: I-D ACTION:draft-bradner-rfc-extracts-00.txt]

2005-02-13 Thread MJ Ray
Simon Josefsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Please explain to them why their behavior frustrate the Debian > community. (But stop your blood from boiling first...) If you have the time, please go and do it. IETF have been broken awhile and I do not believe they are ignorant that:- * it is not n