This account is no longer active. Thus, your
mail regarding "[PMX:VIRUS] Re:" will not be received.
On Mon, 20 Dec 2004, Josh Triplett wrote:
> > I am totally fine if people put it in distributions as php4-xdebug.
> > AFAIK freebsd's ports already have this, and so will Mandrake in the
> > forseeable feature. It would be silly of me to prohibit this, and this
> > is what IMO the license never in
On Mon, 20 Dec 2004, Josh Triplett wrote:
> >>This is much broader. For example, I cannot write a derivative called
> >>"Brian's Xdebug" or "Xdebug manual" or even "A third-party manual for
> >>Xdebug".
> >
> > The manual is no problem, that's not a derived product.
>
> It could very well be a de
On Mon, 20 Dec 2004, Michael K. Edwards wrote:
> The trouble, I think, is that "derived product" has a legal meaning
> (in the context of copyright) contrary to your common-sense
> interpretation. Anything other than an exact copy of the source code
> you distribute (or, if you distribute binarie
Derick Rethans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Mon, 20 Dec 2004, Josh Triplett wrote:
>
>> >>This is much broader. For example, I cannot write a derivative called
>> >>"Brian's Xdebug" or "Xdebug manual" or even "A third-party manual for
>> >>Xdebug".
>> >
>> > The manual is no problem, that's n
Scripsit Josh Triplett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> One suggestion: you might be able to make the necessary modifications to
> BSD yacc, which I think descends from the original UNIX yacc by way of
> BSD UNIX and the whole AT&T vs. BSD issue.
In this particular case, the modifications consist of changin
Scripsit Derick Rethans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> On Mon, 20 Dec 2004, Josh Triplett wrote:
>> Debian packages frequently contain changes from the upstream
>> versions. (These patches are generally sent upstream, but the
>> Debian maintainer will often apply a patch without waiting for a
>> new upstr
On Tue, 21 Dec 2004, Henning Makholm wrote:
> Scripsit Derick Rethans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > On Mon, 20 Dec 2004, Josh Triplett wrote:
>
> >> Debian packages frequently contain changes from the upstream
> >> versions. (These patches are generally sent upstream, but the
> >> Debian maintainer wil
On Tue, Dec 21, 2004 at 10:45:51AM +, Henning Makholm wrote:
> Scripsit Josh Triplett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> > One suggestion: you might be able to make the necessary modifications to
> > BSD yacc, which I think descends from the original UNIX yacc by way of
> > BSD UNIX and the whole AT&T vs
> > The trouble, I think, is that "derived product" has a legal meaning
> > (in the context of copyright) contrary to your common-sense
> > interpretation. Anything other than an exact copy of the source code
> > you distribute (or, if you distribute binaries, exact copies of them)
> > -- even an
Scripsit Andrew Suffield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> On Tue, Dec 21, 2004 at 10:45:51AM +, Henning Makholm wrote
>> In this particular case, the modifications consist of changing the
>> output language from C to something else. That sounds fairly major;
>> the entire parsing engine would have been h
me> Universal Commercial Code
s/Universal/Uniform/ (whoops)
This and other Model Acts, on which a lot of state laws in the US are
based, may be found at http://www.law.upenn.edu/bll/ulc/ulc.htm .
Cheers,
- Michael
On Tue, Dec 21, 2004 at 11:10:11AM +0100, M?ns Rullg?rd wrote:
> Derick Rethans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > On Mon, 20 Dec 2004, Josh Triplett wrote:
> >
> >> >>This is much broader. For example, I cannot write a derivative called
> >> >>"Brian's Xdebug" or "Xdebug manual" or even "A third-par
Matthew Palmer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Tue, Dec 21, 2004 at 11:10:11AM +0100, M?ns Rullg?rd wrote:
>> Derick Rethans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> > On Mon, 20 Dec 2004, Josh Triplett wrote:
>> >
>> >> >>This is much broader. For example, I cannot write a derivative called
>> >> >>"Bria
An idea parallel to "fair use" is present in the Berne Convention,
under the name "fair practice":
Article 10 (1) It shall be permissible to make quotations from a work
which has already been lawfully made available to the public, provided
that their making is compatible with fair practice, and th
15 matches
Mail list logo