Don Armstrong wrote:
I think we've been here before, done that, and have sold off all of
the t-shirts to help finance the non-existant black helicopters.
Of course there are no black helicopters, -legal helicopters are
actually midnight blue ;-)
On Fri, Nov 26, 2004 at 05:40:02AM -0500, Anthony DeRobertis wrote:
> Don Armstrong wrote:
>
> >I think we've been here before, done that, and have sold off all of
> >the t-shirts to help finance the non-existant black helicopters.
>
> Of course there are no black helicopters, -legal helicopters
Hi all,
Kissfft (http://kissfft.sf.net) ships with a modified BSD license
that says:
/*
Copyright (c) 2003-2004, Mark Borgerding
All rights reserved.
Redistribution and use in source and binary forms, with or
without modification, are permitted provided that the following
conditions are met:
Paul Brossier wrote:
> Kissfft (http://kissfft.sf.net) ships with a modified BSD license
> that says:
>
> /*
> Copyright (c) 2003-2004, Mark Borgerding
>
> All rights reserved.
>
> Redistribution and use in source and binary forms, with or
> without modification, are permitted provided that the
On Fri, Nov 26, 2004 at 10:56:14AM -0800, Josh Triplett wrote:
> The text of this license is nearly identical to that in
> /usr/share/common-licenses/BSD, modulo the different copyright holder
> and the corresponding changes in the third clause and warranty
> disclaimer. Oddly, it seems that "name
Glenn Maynard wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 26, 2004 at 10:56:14AM -0800, Josh Triplett wrote:
>>The text of this license is nearly identical to that in
>>/usr/share/common-licenses/BSD, modulo the different copyright holder
>>and the corresponding changes in the third clause and warranty
>>disclaimer. Odd
On Fri, 26 Nov 2004 14:22:56 -0800 Josh Triplett wrote:
> Agreed. For the same reason, I wonder why one particular variant
> (3-clause, copyright "The Regents of the University of California") of
> the BSD license is included in /usr/share/common-licenses, while the
> standard MIT license is not.
Wesley W. Terpstra <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>What I am concerned about is the following scenario:
>
>Mr. John Wontshare writes a streaming multicast client.
>To deal with packet loss, he uses my error-correcting library.
>Without my library, Mr. Wontshare's client can't work at all.
That stateme
Nathanael Nerode wrote:
If your library has a well-specified API, anyone could make a library with the
same API, and his client could use that. Under those circumstances, his
client is not a derivative work of your library (although it may be a
derivative work of the *API and other specificatio
9 matches
Mail list logo
