Arnoud Engelfriet wrote:
See
http://europa.eu.int/ISPO/legal/en/ecommerce/digsig.html
I think you meant:
http://europa.eu.int/ISPO/legal/en/ecommerc/digsig.html
Unfortunately, the link to the directive on that page is 404 compliant.
From the 2.0.10 -> 11 patch:
+ /*
+
+ This code has been modified from its original form by psoTFX @ phpbb.com
+ Changes introduce the back-ported phpBB 2.2 visual confirmation code.
+
+ NOTE: Anyone using the modified code contained within this script
MUST include
+ a relevant mes
Package: microcode.ctl
Version: 1.11-1
Severity: normal
Hi, people!
CC-ing upstream, as it applies to them rather than to Debian, and
debian-legal, as it will end up there anyways.
IMO, the microcode update license forbids the way of re-distribution as
it is used currently by the Debian package
Jan Minar wrote:
Package: microcode.ctl
Version: 1.11-1
Severity: normal
Hi, people!
CC-ing upstream, as it applies to them rather than to Debian, and
debian-legal, as it will end up there anyways.
IMO, the microcode update license forbids the way of re-distribution as
it is used currently by
Andreas Barth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> * Debian Bug Tracking System ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [041123 20:55]:
>>* Removed documentation. Hope this makes everyone happy. Closes:
>> #281671, #281672, #143536.
>
> No, it doesn't. I hope that you don't mind to much for speaking
> that.
Take
On Tue, Nov 23, 2004 at 12:13:38PM -0800, Ben Pfaff wrote:
> > Brain Carlson, thanks for doing Debian and the release process this
> > dis-service.
>
> There are *lots* more people to thank for this. Brian Carlson is
> just the latest.
Brian Carlson and others, thanks for your efforts in ensurin
Hi All,
I've been asked to get some sort of review from the free software world of the
new OASIS[1] IPR draft. I tried to review it myself, but the legalese is a bit
on the opaque side for me.
The concern is that the new policy, if accepted, might push some OASIS Committee
specifications/wor
On Tue, 23 Nov 2004, Ben Pfaff wrote:
> They've concluded that the GNU FDL does not satisfy the DFSG,
Yes.
> and that everything in Debian (apparently modulo licenses
> themselves) must satisfy the DFSG.
No. The latest amendment to the social contract (GR 2004-004)
indicates that we should at l
Don Armstrong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Tue, 23 Nov 2004, Ben Pfaff wrote:
>> They've concluded that the GNU FDL does not satisfy the DFSG,
>
> Yes.
>
>> and that everything in Debian (apparently modulo licenses
>> themselves) must satisfy the DFSG.
>
> No. The latest amendment to the soci
Hi,
I'm working on a GPL driver for ADSL USB modem driver, plagued (as
appears "usual") with a firmware issue for Sagem Fast 800 Eagle-usb ADSL
USB modems (and others). That similar to speedtouch or (worst) eci /
connexant cases. Our team :
http://wiki.eagle-usb.org/wakka.php?wiki=EagleUsbTeam
The
10 matches
Mail list logo
