Summary: No, this isn't GPL compatible. It's not even free. Violates DFSG 1.
Martin Schulze wrote:
1. You may, without additional permission from the authors, distribute
Elm or components of Elm, with or without additions developed by
you or by others at no charg
Anthony W. Youngman wrote:
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Bob McElrath
An email which clearly says "I assign my copyright in this patch ..." is
probably good enough, provided it's signed so you can prove it's not
forged.
http://profs.lp.findlaw.com/signatures/signature_4.html is interestin
Anthony DeRobertis wrote:
> Anthony W. Youngman wrote:
> >In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Bob McElrath
>
> >An email which clearly says "I assign my copyright in this patch ..." is
> >probably good enough, provided it's signed so you can prove it's not
> >forged.
>
> http://profs.lp.findlaw.co
Users of mimetex, or of any gpl'ed program, should first agree to the
terms and conditions of the gpl. But, at least in the United States,
people under the age of 18 aren't legally competent to agree to
anything.
Wrong. Varies from state to state, but there are certainly things minors
are cons
4 matches
Mail list logo
