Everyone Need This Debian-laptop-request

2004-11-09 Thread Bernice Marcus
User ID: 1 stopwatch Date: Wed, 10 Nov 2004 02:38:11 +0300 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--965878669678455575" 965878669678455575 Content-Type: text/plain; Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit The L0west price of all med's is here. V1a'gra - $89 Hyd

Re: APT-HOWTO is under the GFDL

2004-11-09 Thread Gustavo Noronha Silva
Em Seg, 2004-11-08 às 21:34 -0800, Josh Triplett escreveu: > > Should a bug be filed, in your opinion? > > Definitely. Please do. > No, I don't think leaving it unspecified is an incorrect application, > though it doesn't exactly follow the application guidelines in the GFDL > itself. I would t

Fwd: Re: Bug#278474: mimetex: licensing issue

2004-11-09 Thread Isaac Clerencia
Hi, Debian legal folks. Can you help me a bit with this issue? --- Begin Message --- Hi, Your discussion was brought to my attention, so I thought I'd explain my reasoning regarding the paragraph in mimetex's gpl licensing terms (at http://www.forkosh.com/mimetex.html) which reads By using

Fwd: Bug#278474: mimetex: licensing issue

2004-11-09 Thread Isaac Clerencia
There are tons of programs using the GPL license without that special paragraph about age, so I think there should not be any problem, but anyway may be some of the Debian legal folks can help us. Best regards --- Begin Message --- Hi, Your discussion was brought to my attention, so I thou

Re: Fwd: Re: Bug#278474: mimetex: licensing issue

2004-11-09 Thread Don Armstrong
[Nothing contained within should be construed as legal advice.] John Forkosh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Your discussion was brought to my attention, so I thought I'd > explain my reasoning regarding the paragraph in mimetex's gpl > licensing terms (at http://www.forkosh.com/mimetex.html) which rea

Re: Fwd: Bug#278474: mimetex: licensing issue

2004-11-09 Thread Michael Poole
Isaac Clerencia writes: > Returning to the gpl, the same 15-year-old could, for example, > incorporate gpl'ed code into a proprietary product, and there'd be > no legal recourse. He could even sue the author of a gpl'ed > program for damages if the program misbehaves. The author would > pr

Re: Fwd: Re: Bug#278474: mimetex: licensing issue

2004-11-09 Thread Henning Makholm
Scripsit Isaac Clerencia <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Returning to the gpl, the same 15-year-old could, for example, > incorporate gpl'ed code into a proprietary product, and there'd be > no legal recourse. He could even sue the author of a gpl'ed > program for damages if the program misbehaves.

Re: APT-HOWTO is under the GFDL

2004-11-09 Thread Francesco Poli
On Tue, 09 Nov 2004 11:01:28 -0200 Gustavo Noronha Silva wrote: > > > Should a bug be filed, in your opinion? > > > > Definitely. > > Please do. OK, I'll file a bug ASAP. > > > No, I don't think leaving it unspecified is an incorrect > > application, though it doesn't exactly follow the appli