Date index for period starts at
http://lists.debian.org/debian-legal/2004/09/maillist.html#00349
There were 4 threads with more than 5 posts:
Open Software License v2.1, over 80 posts this week to 26 Sep,
http://lists.debian.org/debian-legal/2004/09/msg00523.html
Bug#265352: grub: Debian spla
[EMAIL PROTECTED](B
$B7P:QJ88K%a%k%^%,C4Ev!'LpBt(B
$B!!(B
$Bl9g$O$=$N;]$r!!(Bhttp://gogoway.pimpdomain.com/melmaga/teishi.html$B$^$G(B
$B(B
$B%a!<%k%^%,%8
I'm pleased to see that documentation writers are trying to figure
out a way to clean up some issues with the GNU FDL. It seems,
though, that some of the commenters are getting sidetracked by side
issues.
Side issue #1: even a GFDL with exceptions is still going to be GPL
incompatible. True, bu
On 2004-09-29 00:23:01 +0100 Joe Buck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Side issue #3: claims that we should tell people to use the GPL for
documentation. That's a bad idea, as if I sell my GPL-covered printed
book to a friend, and that book was produced from, say, DocBook SGML,
I
have to either give
Joe Buck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I'm pleased to see that documentation writers are trying to figure
> out a way to clean up some issues with the GNU FDL. It seems,
> though, that some of the commenters are getting sidetracked by side
> issues.
>
> Side issue #1: even a GFDL with exceptions
On Tue, Sep 28, 2004 at 04:23:01PM -0700, Joe Buck wrote:
> Side issue #1: even a GFDL with exceptions is still going to be GPL
> incompatible. True, but that's also the case for several other
> licenses that are considered DFSG-free, so the point isn't relevant
> for this discussion. We can reco
7 matches
Mail list logo
