* Matthew Garrett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [040915 19:31]:
> > An elementary point of Free Software is to protect the rights of the
> > users, not excluding "bad" ones. (Or will GPL3 have a section
> > termination the licence if you breach any FSF copyright?)
>
> RMS is quoted as saying "Misusing a GPL
Bernhard R. Link <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> * Matthew Garrett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [040915 19:31]:
>> RMS is quoted as saying "Misusing a GPL-covered program permanently
>> forfeits the right to distribute the code at all", which implies that
>> the GPL doesn't protect the rights of people who hav
If we need to discuss MIT-License in length, there probably should be
a new thread about this. However I'm still looking forward to recieve
answers to my initial question.
> > It says you have to include the permission notice in any "substantial
> > portions of the Software" no matter if source or
On Wed, Sep 15, 2004 at 05:57:49PM -0400, Michael Poole wrote:
> Andrew Suffield writes:
>
> > On Wed, Sep 15, 2004 at 09:00:39AM -0400, Michael Poole wrote:
> > > Andrew Suffield writes:
> > >
> > > > Long-standing conclusions, summarised:
> > > >
> > > > Terminating licenses (copyright, patent
Matthew Garrett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Bernhard R. Link <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> * Matthew Garrett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [040915 19:31]:
>>> RMS is quoted as saying "Misusing a GPL-covered program permanently
>>> forfeits the right to distribute the code at all", which implies that
>>> t
Brian Thomas Sniffen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> No. The GPL terminates only for non-compliance, and places no
> restrictions beyond those imposed by law. That's free. Attempts to
> bargain in a license, to say "I'll give you a license to this stuff,
> but only if you give me a license to stuf
Brian Thomas Sniffen writes:
> I don't see any free way of terminating a license for reasons other than
> non-compliance.
You are leaving out some important words or conditions here, but I'm
not sure what they are -- a copyright-based license can include
restrictions that are prohibited by the DF
On Thu, Sep 16, 2004 at 01:43:57PM -0400, Brian Thomas Sniffen wrote:
> I don't see any free way of terminating a license for reasons other than
> non-compliance.
That's pretty much a tautology.
If a license requires that you never brush your teeth, and you brush
your teeth, you're not complying
ADSL ILLIMITE TISCALI + TELEPHONE GRATUIT
Surfez 40 fois plus vite pour 30EUR/mois seulement ! Et téléphonez partout en
France gratuitement,
vers les postes fixes (hors numéros spéciaux). Tarifs très avantageux vers les
mobiles et l'interna
ADSL ILLIMITE TISCALI + TELEPHONE GRATUIT
Surfez 40 fois plus vite pour 30EUR/mois seulement ! Et téléphonez partout en
France gratuitement,
vers les postes fixes (hors numéros spéciaux). Tarifs très avantageux vers les
mobiles et l'interna
Glenn Maynard wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 14, 2004 at 11:33:59PM -0700, Josh Triplett wrote:
>
>>>I don't think many people are seriously advocating that the DFSG only
>>>applies to restrictions made under copyright law.
>>
>>In that thread, several people suggested that a restriction such as "You
>>may
Sven Luther wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 24, 2004 at 12:30:31PM -0400, Brian Thomas Sniffen wrote:
>>Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>>On Tue, Aug 24, 2004 at 12:13:31PM -0400, Brian Thomas Sniffen wrote:
Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>BSD license, C has freedom with respec
On Thu, Sep 16, 2004 at 05:18:36PM -0700, Josh Triplett wrote:
> Sven Luther wrote:
> > On Tue, Aug 24, 2004 at 12:30:31PM -0400, Brian Thomas Sniffen wrote:
> >>Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >>>On Tue, Aug 24, 2004 at 12:13:31PM -0400, Brian Thomas Sniffen wrote:
> Sven Luther <[EM
I must apologize for my noisy unsubscription to the lists.
I'm moving tomorrow morning and won't have access to the
internet for a while...
And thinking at things at one time is something it seems
i'am not very good at.
So please forgive me.
Cordially,
Nicolas CANIART.
A
Harald Geyer wrote:
>Joachim Breitner wrote:
>>Harald Geyer wrote:
>>>Is there some other "as free as public domain" license? I don't like
>>>to reinvent the wheel, but I haven't found one yet.\
>>
>>I ususally recommend and use the MIT-Licence for that, it essentially
>>says the same stuff as you
Andrew Suffield writes:
> > By way of example, you have no right to distribute a GPLed work if you
> > attempt to charge users for patent licenses related to the work.
>
> This is not true, nor does it approximate something which is true.
4. You may not copy, modify, sublicense, or distribute
16 matches
Mail list logo
