Re: ocaml, QPL and the DFSG: New ocaml licence proposal.

2004-08-01 Thread Sven Luther
On Sat, Jul 31, 2004 at 10:30:15AM -0700, Josh Triplett wrote: > Sven Luther wrote: > > On Sat, Jul 31, 2004 at 08:55:08AM -0700, Josh Triplett wrote: > > > >>Sven Luther wrote: > >> > >>>On Sat, Jul 31, 2004 at 10:11:38AM +1000, Matthew Palmer wrote: > >>> > >>> > On Fri, Jul 30, 2004 at 07:4

Re: ocaml, QPL and the DFSG: New ocaml licence proposal.

2004-08-01 Thread Sven Luther
On Sun, Aug 01, 2004 at 10:43:29AM +1000, Matthew Palmer wrote: > On Sat, Jul 31, 2004 at 11:17:47AM +0200, Sven Luther wrote: > > Well, no, you cannot remove the existing copyright statement. Still the > > clause > > 3 deals with patches, and you can add your own copyright statement. I > > unders

Re: ocaml, QPL and the DFSG: New ocaml licence proposal.

2004-08-01 Thread Sven Luther
On Sat, Jul 31, 2004 at 09:51:42PM +0200, Francesco Poli wrote: > On Thu, 29 Jul 2004 05:53:14 -0400 (EDT) Walter Landry wrote: > > > Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > So this solves most of the issues, and we need to go through the QPL > > > 3b again, but upstream feels it is a reasona

もう迷わ ないで下 さい!

2004-08-01 Thread bigtrail777
当配信は送信に関する特定商表示義務規定に則り送信しています。 未承諾広告※ ご迷惑な方は削除してください。 受信拒否(購読解除)の方は下記のURLか又はホームページ本文 よりお願いいたします   http://beingmail.mydns.jp/scripts/deleteform.html http://newmail.servebeer.com/scripts/deleteform.html 販売者 Eソリューソンズ  所在地 京都市西京区下津林番条町100 代表者 安田 信子     TEL 0774-56-6428  1週間以内に収集した30万メール

Re: ocaml, QPL and the DFSG: New ocaml licence proposal.

2004-08-01 Thread Francesco Poli
On Sun, 1 Aug 2004 09:03:31 +0200 Sven Luther wrote: > > It forces me to grant to the initial developer more rights to my > > code than he/she granted me to his/her own code. > > Easy, you place your patch under the QPL, and then if upstream applies > the patch, he clearly makes a modification of

Re: Free non-software stuff and what does it mean. [was Re: General Resolution: Force AMD64 into Sarge]

2004-08-01 Thread Francesco Poli
On Sat, 24 Jul 2004 05:31:18 -0400 Glenn Maynard wrote: > The question, for me, is whether starting to require this source is > useful for Debian, balanced against the cost of throwing out stuff > that clearly fails it, and the added maintenance costs (maintainers > having to track down sources).

Re: SRP

2004-08-01 Thread Andres Salomon
On Mon, 26 Jul 2004 19:11:26 -0700, Russ Allbery wrote: > MiguelGea <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >> Hello debian-legal, >> I'm thinking about packaging SRP for debian. > >> Question 1: I'm not sure if there are any problem on packaging it. What >> do you think about? > > Please note that SRP

Re: MySQL FOSS Exception

2004-08-01 Thread Andres Salomon
On Mon, 26 Jul 2004 13:30:24 +0200, Francesco P. Lovergine wrote: > On Sun, Jul 25, 2004 at 12:20:22PM +, Andreas Metzler wrote: >> Francesco Paolo Lovergine debian.org> writes: [...] >> >> http://zak.greant.com:/licensing/rlog?f=licensing/FLOSS-exception.txt >> cu andreas >

Invitation

2004-08-01 Thread Isabella
Whats up? Coupon for $20 to try our online gambling den, Fast payouts, generous bonuses. Enter: gaming-money.com in your address bar, after your register coupon code: FR93P Recieve 200 dollars on your first transaction Copy: gaming-money.com in your address bar, after your register type in coup