John Hasler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Wouter Verhelst writes:
>> This is good, but it's not true anywhere else; so if the reverse
>> engineering has been done outside the EU, there's a problem.
>
> Reverse-engineering is legal in the USA.
And in Norway.
--
Måns Rullgård
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
dear sir
my name is claude,a student at the university
of kinshasa,i need a financial help from you
interested in grants
please help me
Yahoo! Mail : votre e-mail personnel et gratuit qui vous suit partout !
Créez votre Yahoo! Mail sur
On Mon, May 24, 2004 at 01:41:09AM +0200, Bartosz Fenski aka fEnIo wrote:
> On Mon, May 24, 2004 at 01:20:47AM +0200, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
> > > May I ask you in which country reverse-engineering for compatibility is
> > > forbidden?
> > >
> > > I'm just curious, because it is legal in Poland, b
On Mon, May 24, 2004 at 10:56:09AM +0200, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
> > > > I'm just curious, because it is legal in Poland, but only for
> > > > compatibility reasons, and I guess this situation fits this.
> > >
> > > That's because Poland is part of the EU now, where it is legal.
> >
> > No. It wa
On Wed, May 19, 2004 at 02:17:39PM -0400, Raul Miller wrote:
> On Wed, May 19, 2004 at 01:31:11PM -0400, Glenn Maynard wrote:
> > "cause the modified files to carry prominent notices"; it doesn't say "the
> > modified files or loosely associated metadata".
>
> Nit: "carry" and "contain" are not th
5 matches
Mail list logo