Collection of approved licences in the wiki

2004-04-21 Thread Joachim Breitner
Hi debian-legal, since for some reason we don't have that, I started to collect DFSG-compliant licences on http://wiki.debian.net/index.cgi?DFSGLicences I added the obvious important ones, other will be added later. If possible, with link to the debian-legal list of course. Non-compliant licence

Re: Collection of approved licences in the wiki

2004-04-21 Thread Frank Lichtenheld
On Wed, Apr 21, 2004 at 06:45:22PM +0200, Joachim Breitner wrote: > Hi debian-legal, > > since for some reason we don't have that, I started to collect > DFSG-compliant licences on http://wiki.debian.net/index.cgi?DFSGLicences > > I added the obvious important ones, other will be added later. If

Re: Collection of approved licences in the wiki

2004-04-21 Thread Joachim Breitner
Hi, Well, what 'bout this: People like everybody improves the wiki page, and you just sync the webpage with it every once in a while, choosing stuff that is important. You, of course, are invited to add whatever you have collected so far. nomeata Am Mi, den 21.04.2004 schrieb Frank Lichtenheld

Re: Question about DFSG and a THC project

2004-04-21 Thread Sam Hartman
> "Jacobo" == Jacobo Tarrio <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Jacobo> O Martes, 20 de Abril de 2004 ás 13:52:19 -0700, Jake Appelbaum escribía: Jacobo> Let this be my first try at a license analysis in d-l :) >> 5. In all other respects the GPL 2.0 applies Jacobo> Oh, a nonconsis

Re: Freepats

2004-04-21 Thread Sam Hartman
> "MJ" == MJ Ray <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> What if the *.wav file has since been edited in Brian> a wav editor and cannot be automatically recreated? MJ> So be it. It's just been compiled in an odd way. A description would MJ> be nice. I disagree. If I edit the sound fo

Re: GPL vs. OSL

2004-04-21 Thread Anibal Monsalve Salazar
On Wed, Mar 31, 2004 at 10:20:55AM +0200, Tomas Pospisek wrote: >AFAI can see elfutils is doubly licenced under GPL and/or OSL: > >* two COPYING files - one for GPL other for OSL >* NEWS says: > "[...] > Version 0.91: > [...] > libelf: change to GPL from OSL1 for now." >* elfutils.spec says:

Re: Freepats

2004-04-21 Thread MJ Ray
On 2004-04-22 00:13:31 +0100 Sam Hartman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: "MJ" == MJ Ray <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> What if the *.wav file has since been edited in Brian> a wav editor and cannot be automatically recreated? MJ> So be it. It's just been compiled in an odd way. A descri

Re: Question about DFSG and a THC project

2004-04-21 Thread MJ Ray
On 2004-04-22 00:08:31 +0100 Sam Hartman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> "Jacobo" == Jacobo Tarrio <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Jacobo> O Martes, 20 de Abril de 2004 ás 13:52:19 -0700, Jake Appelbaum > escribía: > Jacobo> Let this be my first try at a license analysis in d-l :) >

Re: Freepats

2004-04-21 Thread Walter Landry
MJ Ray <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 2004-04-22 00:13:31 +0100 Sam Hartman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >> "MJ" == MJ Ray <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > >> What if the *.wav file has since been edited in > > Brian> a wav editor and cannot be automatically recreated? > > MJ> So

Re: GPL vs. OSL

2004-04-21 Thread MJ Ray
On 2004-04-22 01:26:20 +0100 Anibal Monsalve Salazar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Wed, Mar 31, 2004 at 10:20:55AM +0200, Tomas Pospisek wrote: AFAI can see elfutils is doubly licenced under GPL and/or OSL: Could someone shed some light on the license issues related to bug #239518? elfutils

Re: Question about DFSG and a THC project

2004-04-21 Thread Sam Hartman
> "MJ" == MJ Ray <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: MJ> On 2004-04-22 00:08:31 +0100 Sam Hartman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> MJ> wrote: >>> "Jacobo" == Jacobo Tarrio <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> Jacobo> O Martes, 20 de Abril de 2004 ás 13:52:19 -0700, Jacobo> Jake Appelbaum