Here are some comments on the draft summary: I think I'd make these changes
>It is likely that Creative Commons does not intend this to be a Free
"quite possible"? I'm not sure about "likely".
>license in the sense of the DFSG. However, since requiring attribution
>and credit is acceptable under
Henning Makholm wrote:
> Scripsit Walter Landry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> Henning Makholm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> > A side question: Does -legal think that it would be OK for Debian to
>> > distribute *checksums* of the non-free magic blob-of-bits, such that
>> > it can be located inside a W
Henning Makholm wrote:
> Scripsit Branden Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
>> There's absolutely no point even implying that we need their permission
>> to reverse engineer anything,
>
> If we are going to distribute code that has been derived by reverse
> engineering, then we do need permission f
Henning Makholm wrote:
> Scripsit Henning Makholm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
>> It ought not to be difficult (neither in a technical or in a
>> economic/legal sense) for manufacturers to ship the standard firmware
>> as a separate file on the driver CD that usually accompanies such
>> hardware, and fo
4 matches
Mail list logo
